Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood
Published on: October 12, 2012
Risk Benefit Analysis in Reference to use of LMWH in COVID-19
Shambo Samrat Samajdar1, Priya Ann Sam2, Saibal Moitra3
1DM Resident in Clinical Pharmacology, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata.
Insights
Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) offers a favorable risk-benefit profile for preventing blood clots in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. This analysis supports LMWH for thrombosis prophylaxis in severe cases, improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hematology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- COVID-19 infection frequently leads to cardiovascular and respiratory complications, including venous thromboembolism (VTE) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).
- A prothrombotic state, characterized by elevated fibrin, fibrin degradation products, fibrinogen, and D-dimers, is associated with COVID-19.
- Heparin therapy has been considered for COVID-19 patients due to the risks of VTE and DIC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a risk-benefit analysis of using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for thrombosis prophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of LMWH in the context of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical evidence and case studies.
- Analysis of safety aspects concerning LMWH use in COVID-19 patients.
- Assessment of heparin's role in managing COVID-19 complications.
Main Results:
- COVID-19 is linked to inflammation and a prothrombotic state, increasing clotting risks.
- Heparin treatment, including LMWH, appears to correlate with improved prognosis in severe COVID-19 patients with coagulopathy.
- Studies indicate better outcomes for severe COVID-19 patients receiving LMWH for thrombosis prophylaxis, especially those with elevated D-dimer levels.
Conclusions:
- LMWH demonstrates a potentially favorable risk-benefit profile for thrombosis prophylaxis in COVID-19 patients.
- The use of LMWH is supported by clinical evidence for improving prognosis in severe COVID-19 with coagulopathy.
- Further investigation into heparin's role in managing COVID-19 complications is warranted.
Abstract:
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are frequent cardiovascular and/or respiratory complications among hospitalized patients of COVID-19 infection. A relatively high mortality of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is worrying, and the application of heparin in COVID-19 has been assessed and recommended with some expert consensus because of the risk of DIC and venous thromboembolism. However, "Risk Benefit Analysis" on the aspect of safety in using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in COVID-19 patients for thrombosis prophylaxis has been explained below with a few case studies and detailed information from various clinical evidence. COVID-19 infection has been associated with inflammation and a prothrombotic state, with increase in fibrin, fibrin degradation products, fibrinogen, and D-dimers. Heparin treatment including unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin appears to be associated with better prognosis in severe COVID-19 patients with coagulopathy. Major studies since the onset of this pandemic, found better prognosis in severe COVID-19 patients meeting SIC criteria or with markedly elevated D-dimer, by approaching thrombosis prophylaxis with LMWH.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

