Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI
Published on: February 3, 2015
Foveal pRF properties in the visual cortex depend on the extent of stimulated visual field
Gokulraj T Prabhakaran1, Joana Carvalho2, Azzurra Invernizzi2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Abstract:
Previous studies demonstrated that alterations in functional MRI derived receptive field (pRF) properties in cortical projection zones of retinal lesions can erroneously be mistaken for cortical large-scale reorganization in response to visual system pathologies. We tested, whether such confounds are also evident in the normal cortical projection zone of the fovea for simulated peripheral visual field defects. We applied fMRI-based visual field mapping of the central visual field at 3 T in eight controls to compare the pRF properties of the central visual field of a reference condition (stimulus radius: 14°) and two conditions with simulated peripheral visual field defect, i.e., with a peripheral gray mask, stimulating only the central 7° or 4° radius. We quantified, for the cortical representation of the actually stimulated visual field, the changes in the position and size of the pRFs associated with reduced peripheral stimulation using conventional and advanced pRF modeling. We found foveal pRF-positions (≤3°) to be significantly shifted towards the periphery (p<0.05, corrected). These pRF-shifts were largest for the 4° condition [visual area (mean eccentricity shift): V1 (0.9°), V2 (0.9°), V3 (1.0°)], but also evident for the 7° condition [V1 (0.5°), V2 (0.5°), V3 (0.9°)]. Further, an overall enlargement of pRF-sizes was observed. These findings indicate the dependence of foveal pRF parameters on the spatial extent of the stimulated visual field and are likely associated with methodological biases and/or physiological mechanisms. Consequently, our results imply that, previously reported similar findings in patients with actual peripheral scotomas need to be interpreted with caution and indicate the need for adequate control conditions in investigations of visual cortex reorganization.
Insights
Simulated peripheral vision loss shifts foveal (central) visual field receptive field (pRF) positions and enlarges their size. These findings in visual cortex mapping suggest caution when interpreting patient studies of visual reorganization.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Visual Neuroscience
- Functional Neuroimaging
Background:
- Alterations in functional MRI (fMRI) derived population receptive field (pRF) properties in visual cortex projection zones of retinal lesions can be mistaken for large-scale cortical reorganization.
- It remains unclear if similar confounds exist in normal visual cortex projections, particularly for the fovea, under simulated peripheral visual field defects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether simulated peripheral visual field defects introduce confounds in the foveal representation within the normal visual cortex.
- To quantify changes in pRF properties (position and size) in response to reduced peripheral stimulation in the central visual field.
Main Methods:
- fMRI-based visual field mapping of the central visual field at 3 Tesla in eight healthy controls.
- Comparison of pRF properties under a reference condition (14° stimulus radius) versus simulated peripheral defects (7° and 4° stimulus radii) using a peripheral gray mask.
- Quantification of pRF shifts and size changes using conventional and advanced pRF modeling for the cortical representation of the stimulated visual field.
Main Results:
- Foveal pRF positions (≤3°) significantly shifted towards the periphery (p<0.05, corrected) under simulated defects.
- The largest shifts were observed in the 4° condition (V1: 0.9°, V2: 0.9°, V3: 1.0°), with notable shifts also in the 7° condition (V1: 0.5°, V2: 0.5°, V3: 0.9°).
- An overall enlargement of pRF sizes was consistently observed across conditions with reduced peripheral stimulation.
Conclusions:
- Foveal pRF parameters are dependent on the spatial extent of the stimulated visual field, indicating potential methodological biases or physiological mechanisms.
- Previously reported pRF alterations in patients with actual peripheral scotomas should be interpreted with caution.
- Adequate control conditions are necessary for accurate investigations of visual cortex reorganization in response to visual pathologies.
Related Concept Videos
Anatomy of the Eyeball
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Vision
The Retina
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways
Color Vision

