Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Comparison of the collum angle of incisors and canines in skeletal malocclusions - A CBCT study
Bharathi Elangovan1, Bhadrinath Srinivasan1, Vignesh Kailasam1
1Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Department of Orthodontics, Chennai, India.
Introduction:
The collum angle that defines the crown root angulation of the single rooted teeth plays an important in treatment planning.
Objective:
To compare the collum angle (crown root angulation) of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth in different skeletal malocclusions using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Materials And Methods:
Sixty subjects were categorized into four groups (fifteen subjects in each group) Class I, Class II division 1, Class II division 2 malocclusion and Class III based on Angle classification, Wits and ANB. The collum angle of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth was measured using CBCT. One way ANOVA, Post hoc comparison with Tukey HSD and Paired t-test were used to analyse the measured data.
Results:
The collum angle of corresponding right and left side teeth were averaged. Thus, the mean and standard deviation of the collum angle (n-30) were generated for maxillary and mandibular central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines. A statistically significant increase was observed in the maxillary central incisors of Class II division 2 and mandibular lateral incisors of class III malocclusion. The collum angle was increased in mandibular canines of Class III malocclusion when compared with class I and Class II division 2 malocclusion. The collum angle was negative in mandibular central incisors of Class II division 2. No statistically significant difference was observed in the mean collum angle between the right and left side anterior teeth in all the four groups.
Conclusion:
A variation in Collum angle was observed between the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth and malocclusions. The effect of these variations in collum angle in torque expression and biomechanics should be kept in mind by the orthodontist before treatment planning especially in Class II division 2 malocclusion.
