Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.4K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

254.8K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
254.8K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

63.8K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
63.8K
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

145
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
145
Structuralism01:26

Structuralism

2.9K
Structuralism, an early psychological theory developed by Wilhelm Wundt and his student Edward Bradford Titchener, sought to dissect the human mind into its most fundamental components. Wundt's groundbreaking work in his laboratory set the stage for Titchener to define structuralism's goal as cataloging the "atoms" of the mind—sensations, images, and feelings—akin to how chemists identify elements of matter.
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He...
2.9K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

33.7K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
33.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement.

PloS one·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.5K

Disarming the Ultimate Historical Challenge to Scientific Realism.

Peter Vickers

    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
    |August 18, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary

    Scientific realism faces a challenge from Arnold Sommerfeld's hydrogen fine structure theory. Despite flawed methods, his accurate predictions offer a defense for scientific realism through structural continuity.

    Area of Science:

    • Physics
    • Philosophy of Science

    Background:

    • Arnold Sommerfeld's 1916 derivation of hydrogen fine structure energy levels presents a historical challenge to scientific realism.
    • Sommerfeld's theory yielded accurate predictions, matching later Dirac calculations, despite relying on classical approximations and flawed central concepts.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address the challenge posed by Sommerfeld's "miraculous" success to the "no miracles argument" in scientific realism.
    • To develop a realist defense by examining the continuity of relevant structures between older and newer theories.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of Sommerfeld's semi-classical derivation of hydrogen fine structure.
    • Comparison of Sommerfeld's approach with later quantum mechanics (Schrödinger-Heisenberg and Dirac).
    • Philosophical examination of scientific realism and the "no miracles argument" in light of historical scientific discontinuities.

    More Related Videos

    Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
    07:46

    Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

    Published on: November 15, 2013

    8.8K
    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
    06:54

    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

    Published on: June 21, 2019

    6.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 11, 2025

    Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
    07:43

    Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

    Published on: August 4, 2023

    2.5K
    Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
    07:46

    Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

    Published on: November 15, 2013

    8.8K
    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
    06:54

    Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

    Published on: June 21, 2019

    6.2K

    Main Results:

    • Sommerfeld's derivation, while methodologically flawed, produced accurate results through a combination of classical and relativistic considerations.
    • The success of Sommerfeld's theory, despite its inaccuracies, highlights a continuity of relevant structures that can be leveraged for a realist defense.
    • The discontinuities between Sommerfeld's theory and modern quantum mechanics do not necessarily undermine scientific realism.

    Conclusions:

    • A realist defense can be constructed by focusing on the sufficient continuity of relevant structures across theoretical changes.
    • The case of Sommerfeld's theory demonstrates that accurate predictions can arise from theories with non-approximately true central elements.
    • This analysis offers a nuanced perspective on scientific realism, accommodating historical anomalies through structural continuity.