Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
Published on: August 5, 2008
Integrated sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization in familial Parkinson disease
Laurie A Robak1, Renqian Du1, Bo Yuan1
1Department of Molecular and Human Genetics (L.A.R., R.D., B.Y., S.G., V.K., E.H., A.S., E.Y., C.Z., X.S., H.D., T.G., Z.C.A., A.T., C.S., W.B., J.E.P., J.R.L., J.M.S.), Department of Neurology (I.A.-D., J.J., J.M.S.), and Human Genome Sequencing Center (S.N.J., D.M.M., J.R.L.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Baylor Genetics (W.B.), Houston, TX; Department of Neurology (O.A.R.), Department of Neuroscience (O.A.R.), and Department of Clinical Genomics (O.A.R.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic (J.J.) and Department of Pediatrics (J.R.L., J.M.S.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Department of Pediatrics (J.R.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neuroscience (J.M.S.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; and Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute (J.M.S.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
Objective:
To determine how single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs) contribute to molecular diagnosis in familial Parkinson disease (PD), we integrated exome sequencing (ES) and genome-wide array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and further probed CNV structure to reveal mutational mechanisms.
Methods:
We performed ES on 110 subjects with PD and a positive family history; 99 subjects were also evaluated using genome-wide aCGH. We interrogated ES and aCGH data for pathogenic SNVs and CNVs at Mendelian PD gene loci. We confirmed SNVs via Sanger sequencing and further characterized CNVs with custom-designed high-density aCGH, droplet digital PCR, and breakpoint sequencing.
Results:
Using ES, we discovered individuals with known pathogenic SNVs in GBA (p.Glu365Lys, p.Thr408Met, p.Asn409Ser, and p.Leu483Pro) and LRRK2 (p.Arg1441Gly and p.Gly2019Ser). Two subjects were each double heterozygotes for variants in GBA and LRRK2. Based on aCGH, we additionally discovered cases with an SNCA duplication and heterozygous intragenic GBA deletion. Five additional subjects harbored both SNVs (p.Asn52Metfs*29, p.Thr240Met, p.Pro437Leu, and p.Trp453*) and likely disrupting CNVs at the PRKN locus, consistent with compound heterozygosity. In nearly all cases, breakpoint sequencing revealed microhomology, a mutational signature consistent with CNV formation due to DNA replication errors.
Conclusions:
Integrated ES and aCGH yielded a genetic diagnosis in 19.3% of our familial PD cohort. Our analyses highlight potential mechanisms for SNCA and PRKN CNV formation, uncover multilocus pathogenic variation, and identify novel SNVs and CNVs for further investigation as potential PD risk alleles.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Parkinson Disease l: Introduction
Parkinson Disease ll: Pathophysiology

