Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Mice
Published on: May 27, 2010
Programmed electrical stimulation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Results in patients with and without cardiac arrest
K H Kuck1, K P Kunze, M Schlüter
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany.
Insights
Programmed electrical stimulation can induce dangerous ventricular arrhythmias in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. This testing helps identify individuals at risk for sudden cardiac events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic heart condition associated with ventricular arrhythmias.
- Identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death remains a clinical challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of programmed electrical stimulation (PES) in inducing ventricular arrhythmias in symptomatic and asymptomatic HCM patients.
- To determine if PES can identify HCM patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias.
Main Methods:
- PES was performed in 54 HCM patients, categorized as symptomatic (n=11) or asymptomatic (n=43).
- Atrial and ventricular stimulation protocols were used to induce arrhythmias.
- Induced arrhythmias were classified by type and duration.
Main Results:
- Ventricular arrhythmias were induced in 18 patients (33%).
- The incidence and type of induced arrhythmias did not significantly differ between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups (19% in asymptomatic).
- Rapid polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were the most common induced arrhythmias.
Conclusions:
- PES is effective in inducing ventricular arrhythmias in HCM patients, including those without prior symptoms.
- Atrial stimulation-induced rapid ventricular tachycardia may identify HCM patients at high risk for exercise-induced ventricular fibrillation.
Abstract:
Programmed electrical stimulation was performed in 54 consecutive patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. There were 11 'symptomatic' patients: three had a history of cardiac arrest due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias (group A), and eight had a history of syncope of unknown origin (group B); 43 patients were 'asymptomatic', i.e. they had no documented or suspected symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias (group C). There were no differences among the groups with respect to electrocardiographic, echocardiographic or hemodynamic data. Ventricular arrhythmias were induced by atrial and right and left ventricular stimulation with a maximum of two extrastimuli in 18 patients. Induced arrhythmias were repetitive ventricular response in six patients, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in four, sustained ventricular tachycardia in five, and ventricular fibrillation in three patients. With one exception, ventricular tachycardia was always rapid (cycle lengths ranged from 180 to 250 ms); it was polymorphic in six patients and monomorphic in three. Atrial stimulation induced rapid monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in one group A patient. The type and incidence of induced ventricular arrhythmias did not differ among the three groups. It is concluded that programmed electrical stimulation induces the same type of ventricular arrhythmia (rapid polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) in 'symptomatic' and 'asymptomatic' patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the incidence in the latter group being 19%. Induction by atrial stimulation of a rapid ventricular tachycardia may be a specific finding to identify patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at risk for exercise-induced ventricular fibrillation.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

