Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring Cellular Processes by Modeling Ligands in Cryo-EM Maps
Published on: July 19, 2024
Identifying key residues and key interactions for the binding of LEAP2 to receptor GHSR1a
Hao-Zheng Li1, Li-Li Shou1, Xiao-Xia Shao1
1Research Center for Translational Medicine at East Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract:
Liver-expressed antimicrobial peptide 2 (LEAP2) was recently identified as a competitive antagonist for the G protein-coupled receptor GHSR1a, the cognate receptor for the gastric peptide ghrelin. LEAP2 plays important functions in energy metabolism by tuning the ghrelin-GHSR1a system. However, the molecular mechanism by which LEAP2 binds to GHSR1a is largely unknown. In the present study, we first conducted alanine-scanning mutagenesis on the N-terminal fragment of human LEAP2 and demonstrated that the positively charged Arg6 and the aromatic Phe4 are essential for LEAP2 binding to GHSR1a. To identify the receptor residues interacting with the essential Arg6 and Phe4 of LEAP2, we conducted extensive site-directed mutagenesis on GHSR1a. After all conserved negatively charged residues in the extracellular regions of human GHSR1a were mutated, only mutation of Asp99 caused much more detriments to GHSR1a binding to LEAP2 than binding to ghrelin, suggesting that the absolutely conserved Asp99 of GHSR1a probably interacts with the essential Arg6 of LEAP2. After five conserved Phe residues in the predicted ligand-binding pocket of human GHSR1a were mutated, three of them were identified as important for GHSR1a binding to LEAP2. According to a structural model of GHSR1a, we deduced that the adjacent Phe279 and Phe312 might interact with the essential Phe4 of LEAP2, while Phe119 might interact with the aromatic Trp5 of LEAP2. The present study provided new insights into the interaction of LEAP2 with its receptor, and would facilitate the design of novel ligands for GHSR1a in future studies.
More Related Videos
06:50Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Related Concept Videos
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Ligand Binding and Linkage