Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding01:15

Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding

575
Enteral nutrition encompasses various methods of delivering nutrition directly to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, bypassing traditional oral intake. It is particularly beneficial for patients who cannot eat by mouth but have a functioning digestive system. Key methods include nasointestinal feeding, gastrostomy, and jejunostomy, each suited to different clinical scenarios based on the patient's needs and condition.
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
575
Dietary Connections01:23

Dietary Connections

61.0K
In biological systems, most metabolic pathways are interconnected. The cellular respiration processes that convert glucose to ATP—such as glycolysis, pyruvate oxidation, and the citric acid cycle—tie into those that break down other organic compounds. As a result, various foods—from apples to cheese to guacamole—end up as ATP. In addition to carbohydrates, food also contains proteins and lipids—such as cholesterol and fats. All of these organic compounds are used...
61.0K
Taste Buds and Receptors01:20

Taste Buds and Receptors

4.2K
Gustation, or the sense of taste, is intrinsically linked to the anatomical structures located on the tongue. This organ's surface, along with the entirety of the oral cavity, is adorned with stratified squamous epithelium. Evident on the tongue are elevated structures known as papillae (singular = papilla), which house the mechanisms for the transduction of gustatory stimuli. Four distinct types of papillae exist, each identified by their unique morphological attributes: the circumvallate,...
4.2K
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption01:23

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption

147
Understanding the physiological differences in the pediatric population is crucial for effective pharmacotherapy. Neonates, infants, and children exhibit significant variations in gastric pH, gastric emptying time, intestinal transit time, and biliary function. These variations profoundly affect oral drug absorption, necessitating a nuanced approach to pediatric dosing.Neonates present with a unique physiological profile, having a gastric pH greater than 4 and faster and more irregular gastric...
147
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition01:27

Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition

523
Parenteral Nutrition (PN) delivers essential nutrients directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the digestive system. It is commonly used for individuals with severe digestive disorders or conditions that prevent normal nutrient absorption.
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
523
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy01:30

Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy

537
Various diagnostic tests are employed in the diagnostic process for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), particularly to differentiate between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
537

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PARENTAL EXPERIENCES WITH SOLD FOOD INTRODUCTION - A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FEEDING APPROACH.

Academic pediatrics·2026
Same author

Patient and caregiver perspectives on threshold-based precautionary allergen labeling.

Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology·2026
Same author

Secondary Rhabdomyosarcoma in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults.

Pediatric blood & cancer·2026
Same author

Multiomic insights into the MPO-mediated NET formation pathway in alcohol-induced epilepsy risk.

Genes & diseases·2026
Same author

Parental Understanding and Implementation of Early Peanut Introduction.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Child Opportunity, Race, and Language in Congenital Cardiac Surgery Outcomes.

Pediatric cardiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 11, 2025

A Treatment Package without Escape Extinction to Address Food Selectivity
04:23

A Treatment Package without Escape Extinction to Address Food Selectivity

Published on: August 21, 2015

11.9K

Recommendations on Complementary Food Introduction Among Pediatric Practitioners.

Waheeda Samady1,2,3, Emily Campbell1,3, Ozge Nur Aktas4

  • 1Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.

JAMA Network Open
|August 18, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Most pediatricians do not recommend waiting 3 days between introducing new foods to infants, potentially limiting food diversity and delaying allergy prevention. Current guidelines may need reevaluation due to evolving food allergy prevention strategies.

More Related Videos

Concept Development and Use of an Automated Food Intake and Eating Behavior Assessment Method
06:21

Concept Development and Use of an Automated Food Intake and Eating Behavior Assessment Method

Published on: February 19, 2021

6.1K
Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
04:56

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Published on: January 25, 2018

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 11, 2025

A Treatment Package without Escape Extinction to Address Food Selectivity
04:23

A Treatment Package without Escape Extinction to Address Food Selectivity

Published on: August 21, 2015

11.9K
Concept Development and Use of an Automated Food Intake and Eating Behavior Assessment Method
06:21

Concept Development and Use of an Automated Food Intake and Eating Behavior Assessment Method

Published on: February 19, 2021

6.1K
Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
04:56

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Published on: January 25, 2018

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Nutrition
  • Infant Feeding Practices
  • Food Allergy Prevention

Background:

  • Current guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics and CDC recommend a 3-5 day waiting period between introducing new complementary foods to infants.
  • Advances in understanding infant food diversity and allergy prevention necessitate a review of current pediatric practitioner recommendations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize pediatric practitioner recommendations on complementary food introduction timing and waiting periods between new foods.
  • To assess alignment between current pediatric practice and existing feeding guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • A 23-item electronic survey was distributed to pediatric health care professionals.
  • The survey targeted physicians, resident physicians, and nurse practitioners providing care to infants aged 12 months or younger.
  • Data were collected from February 1 to April 30, 2019, from members of the Illinois Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the national AAP Council on Early Childhood.

Main Results:

  • A response rate of 27.3% was achieved, with 563 final analyses.
  • Only 38.6% of practitioners recommended waiting 3 days or longer between food introductions, compared to 66.3% for infants at risk for food allergy.
  • Significant variation existed in recommendations for the first complementary food, introduction order, and age of introduction based on breastfeeding status.

Conclusions:

  • Most pediatric practitioners do not adhere to the 3-day waiting period recommendation unless infants are at high risk for food allergy.
  • Current practices may restrict infant food diversity and delay timely introduction of allergenic foods like peanuts.
  • Reevaluation of published infant feeding guidelines is suggested in light of updated food allergy prevention approaches.