Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis
Published on: February 7, 2025
Timeline of sepsis bundle component completion and its association with septic shock outcomes
1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Insights
Completing sepsis bundles within 3 hours significantly lowers septic shock mortality. However, achieving completion in under 1 hour showed no additional survival benefit compared to the 3-hour timeframe.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Sepsis and septic shock are time-sensitive medical emergencies requiring rapid intervention.
- The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) provides guidelines for timely sepsis management.
- The impact of specific timelines for sepsis bundle completion on clinical outcomes remains an area of active investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between the timing of sepsis bundle completion and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock.
- To determine if faster completion of sepsis bundles (e.g., within 1 hour) offers superior benefits compared to completion within 3 hours.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of adult patients diagnosed with septic shock at Mayo Clinic between January 2006 and May 2018.
- Patients were categorized into three groups based on the time to complete sepsis bundle elements: <1 hour, 1.1 to 3 hours, and >3 hours post-diagnosis.
- Clinical outcomes, including 28-day and 90-day mortality, were analyzed across the different completion time groups.
Main Results:
- A total of 1052 septic shock patients were analyzed.
- Patients completing sepsis bundles within 3 hours demonstrated significantly lower 28-day mortality (17.5%) compared to those taking longer (31.4%, p < .001).
- Completion within 3 hours was also associated with improved 90-day survival (HR=0.67; 95% CI 0.55-0.80; p < .001). No significant difference in mortality or survival was observed between completion within 1 hour versus within 3 hours.
Conclusions:
- Completion of sepsis bundle components within 3 hours is associated with reduced mortality and improved outcomes in septic shock.
- The specific benefit of completing sepsis bundles in under 1 hour, compared to within 3 hours, was not statistically significant in this cohort.
- Adherence to the 3-hour sepsis bundle timeframe is crucial for improving patient survival in septic shock.
Purpose:
To assess the impact of the timeline of sepsis bundle completion with clinical outcomes in septic shock.
Materials And Methods:
We retrospectively studied adult (≥18 years) patients with septic shock from January 1, 2006, through May 31, 2018, who were admitted to the intensive care unit in Mayo Clinic, Rochester. We divided patients into three groups based on the SSC compliant 1) <1h, 2) 1.1 to 3 h, 3) >3 h after the time of septic shock diagnosis.
Results:
We enrolled 1052 septic shock patients, among 8% were in group 1, 26% in group 2, and the remaining in group 3. Those who completed all bundle components within 3 h had the lowest 28-day mortality (17.5% vs. 31.4%, p < .001) and higher survival at 90 days (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.55-0.80; p < .001). Sepsis bundle completion in <1 h had no significant advantage in 28-day mortality (21.5% vs.15.9%, p = .4) or 90-day survival compared with group 2 (HR = 1.08; 95% CI 0.77-1.53; p = .6).
Conclusions:
We showed an association between the completion of SSC bundle components within three hours with lower mortality or earlier shock reversal. This relationship was not evident when compared to bundle completion in 1 h vs. within 3 h.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

