Timeline of sepsis bundle component completion and its association with septic shock outcomes

Bo Hu1, Hui Xiang2, Yue Dong3

  • 1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Journal of Critical Care
|August 18, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Completing sepsis bundles within 3 hours significantly lowers septic shock mortality. However, achieving completion in under 1 hour showed no additional survival benefit compared to the 3-hour timeframe.

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Clinical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Sepsis and septic shock are time-sensitive medical emergencies requiring rapid intervention.
  • The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) provides guidelines for timely sepsis management.
  • The impact of specific timelines for sepsis bundle completion on clinical outcomes remains an area of active investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the association between the timing of sepsis bundle completion and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock.
  • To determine if faster completion of sepsis bundles (e.g., within 1 hour) offers superior benefits compared to completion within 3 hours.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of adult patients diagnosed with septic shock at Mayo Clinic between January 2006 and May 2018.
  • Patients were categorized into three groups based on the time to complete sepsis bundle elements: <1 hour, 1.1 to 3 hours, and >3 hours post-diagnosis.
  • Clinical outcomes, including 28-day and 90-day mortality, were analyzed across the different completion time groups.

Main Results:

  • A total of 1052 septic shock patients were analyzed.
  • Patients completing sepsis bundles within 3 hours demonstrated significantly lower 28-day mortality (17.5%) compared to those taking longer (31.4%, p < .001).
  • Completion within 3 hours was also associated with improved 90-day survival (HR=0.67; 95% CI 0.55-0.80; p < .001). No significant difference in mortality or survival was observed between completion within 1 hour versus within 3 hours.

Conclusions:

  • Completion of sepsis bundle components within 3 hours is associated with reduced mortality and improved outcomes in septic shock.
  • The specific benefit of completing sepsis bundles in under 1 hour, compared to within 3 hours, was not statistically significant in this cohort.
  • Adherence to the 3-hour sepsis bundle timeframe is crucial for improving patient survival in septic shock.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care01:29

Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

Diagnosing Pulmonary EmbolismDiagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) involves clinical assessment and advanced imaging tests. The preferred diagnostic tool is the spiral (helical) CT scan or CT angiography (CTA), which uses intravenous contrast media to visualize the pulmonary vasculature and identify emboli.A ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan is an alternative for patients unable to receive contrast media. This scan includes both perfusion and ventilation scanning. Perfusion scanning involves...
152
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment01:30

Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment

Pneumonia poses the potential for numerous complications that warrant consideration. These complications include the following:
677
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care01:28

Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

IntroductionThe management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) aims to minimize myocardial damage, preserve myocardial function, and prevent complications.Initial ManagementInpatient management involves continuous cardiac monitoring, preferably in an ICU, focusing on blood pressure, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels, and urine output. Ongoing pharmacologic management is crucial for stabilizing the patient.Supplemental Oxygen: Administer supplemental oxygen if oxygen saturation is...
135
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
3.5K
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care01:20

Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) requires a collaborative healthcare approach to restore renal function and prevent complications. Essential management strategies involve monitoring fluid and electrolyte balance, adjusting medications, initiating dialysis when necessary, and providing nutritional support.Fluid and Electrolyte ManagementFluid Monitoring: Regularly monitoring body weight, central venous pressure, and urine output helps detect fluid imbalances early. Patient intake and output are...
177
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care01:26

Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

Aneurysm management involves either conservative medical therapy or surgical intervention, depending on the size and symptoms of the aneurysm. Conservative management is generally reserved for smaller, asymptomatic aneurysms, while larger or symptomatic aneurysms often necessitate surgical repair.Conservative Medical TherapyFor small, asymptomatic aneurysms, particularly abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) less than 5.5 centimeters in diameter, conservative medical therapy is recommended. This...
152