Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

305
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
305
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.8K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.8K
Problem Solving: Dimensional Analysis01:08

Problem Solving: Dimensional Analysis

5.6K
Every mathematical equation that connects separate distinct physical quantities must be dimensionally consistent, which implies it must abide by two rules. For this reason, the concept of dimension is crucial. The first rule is that an equation's expressions on either side of an equality must have the exact same dimension, i.e., quantities of the same dimension can be added or removed. The second rule stipulates that all popular mathematical functions, such as exponential, logarithmic, and...
5.6K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

63.5K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
63.5K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.7K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Naïve epistemics: A theory of rational and error-prone mental state reasoning.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Mistakes in Thinking about Cognitive Science and How to Reduce Them.

eNeuro·2024
Same author

The latent scope bias: Robust and replicable.

Cognition·2024
Same author

Reasoning From Quantified Modal Premises.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

Reasoning about possibilities: Modal logics, possible worlds, and mental models.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Iconicity bias and duration.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2023
Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.6K

Reasoning about Durations.

Laura Jane Kelly1, Sangeet Khemlani1, P N Johnson-Laird2,3

  • 1U.S. Naval Research Laboratory.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|August 20, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cognitive systems influence logical reasoning. Intuitive (System 1) reasoning is more accurate for consistent assertions with mental models than deliberative (System 2) reasoning, supporting mental model theory.

More Related Videos

Observation and Analysis of Blinking Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering
05:52

Observation and Analysis of Blinking Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering

Published on: January 11, 2018

7.7K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.6K
Observation and Analysis of Blinking Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering
05:52

Observation and Analysis of Blinking Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering

Published on: January 11, 2018

7.7K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Logic
  • Human reasoning

Background:

  • Consistency of assertions can be assessed using formal logic or intuitive mental models.
  • Formal logic requires proving negations, while mental models involve constructing representations.
  • These two approaches make different predictions about reasoning accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the predictions of formal logic versus mental model theory in assessing assertion consistency.
  • To investigate the role of intuitive (System 1) and deliberative (System 2) reasoning in consistency judgments.
  • To determine how the presence or absence of intuitive models affects accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Participants evaluated the consistency of temporal descriptions.
  • Statements used temporal connectives like "during" and "before."
  • Accuracy was compared for problems with and without intuitive models.

Main Results:

  • Participants were more accurate on consistent problems that had intuitive models.
  • Accuracy did not significantly differ between consistent and inconsistent problems.
  • Performance was better when intuitive models could be readily constructed.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support mental model theory over formal logic in explaining human consistency judgments.
  • Intuitive reasoning (System 1) is more effective when mental models are available.
  • Deliberative reasoning (System 2) may be necessary for complex or non-intuitive problems.