Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of flutamide and Emcyt in hormone-refractory metastatic prostatic cancer

J N de Kernion1, G P Murphy, R Priore

  • 1Division of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Urology
|April 1, 1988
PubMed

Insights

Estramustine phosphate (Emcyt) and flutamide showed similar efficacy in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer patients. Both treatments offered minimal toxicity with noteworthy survival benefits, suggesting further quality of life research.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Urology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Metastatic prostate cancer often becomes refractory to hormone therapy.
  • Effective treatment options for hormone-refractory prostate cancer are limited.
  • Estramustine phosphate (Emcyt) and flutamide are established chemotherapeutic agents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and toxicity of estramustine phosphate (Emcyt) versus flutamide in patients with metastatic prostate cancer refractory to hormone therapy.
  • To evaluate survival and progression-free survival in this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective randomized trial involving 220 patients was conducted by the National Prostatic Cancer Project.
  • Patients were randomized to receive either estramustine phosphate (Emcyt) or flutamide.
  • Data were collected from 1984 to 1985, with evaluation as of July 1986.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in treatment response was observed between estramustine phosphate (Emcyt) and flutamide.
  • Both treatment arms exhibited minimal toxicities.
  • Observed survival and progression-free survival intervals were encouraging given the patient prognosis.

Conclusions:

  • Estramustine phosphate (Emcyt) and flutamide demonstrate comparable efficacy in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer.
  • These agents are well-tolerated with manageable side effects.
  • Future research should focus on quality of life assessments in patients undergoing these treatments.

Related Concept Videos