End-systolic pressure-volume relationships in dogs during ventilation with PEEP

Whether left ventricular (LV) contractility changes during ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) remains controversial. To assess LV inotropic state during PEEP using a load-independent index, we generated end-systolic pressure-volume relationships (ESPVRs) in eight closed-chest, chronically instrumented, anesthetized dogs undergoing 0 [zero end-expiratory pressure for the 1st time (ZEEP1)], 5 (PEEP-5), 10 (PEEP-10), and again 0 (ZEEP2) cmH2O PEEP. LV volume was calculated from three orthogonal internal diameters (sonomicrometry), and LV pressure was measured using an implanted transducer. ESPVRs at each level of PEEP were generated by transient inflation of a vena caval occluder. Despite significant decreases in cardiac output with PEEP-5 (1.81 +/- 0.38 l/min, means +/- SE; P less than 0.05) and PEEP-10 (1.70 +/- 0.46; P less than 0.01) with respect to ZEEP1 (2.12 +/- 0.41), no change was found in the slope (ZEEP1: 6.99 +/- 1.03 mmHg/ml; PEEP-5: 7.48 +/- 1.20; PEEP-10: 7.17 +/- 1.02; ZEEP2: 7.38 +/- 1.02), the volume intercept (ZEEP1: 7.4 +/- 3.4 ml; PEEP-5: 6.6 +/- 3.0; PEEP-10: 7.2 +/- 4.0; ZEEP2: 6.6 +/- 3.6), or the new index area beneath the ESPVR (ZEEP1: 304 +/- 98; PEEP-5: 329 +/- 104; PEEP-10: 310 +/- 98; ZEEP2: 343 +/- 114). We conclude that these levels of PEEP do not affect LV contractility as assessed by the ESPVR.