Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
The Effects of Public Participation on Multi-Level Water Governance, Lessons from Uganda
Emeline Hassenforder1, Olivier Barreteau2, Katherine Anne Daniell3
1G-EAU, INRAE, Cirad, AgroParisTech, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, 361 rue J.F. Breton, BP 5095, 34196, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. emeline.hassenforder@cirad.fr.
Abstract:
Water governance occurs at multiple levels, from the local to the supra-national, which are often highly fragmented. The interconnected nature of water requires interactions among these multiple governance levels. Public participation may foster such interactions. Thus, many water management reforms involved decentralization and public participation worldwide over the last decades. Yet, it is not demonstrated how these reforms may improve water resources sustainability. Their analysis in the literature does not show concretely how interactions among multiple levels materialize and are influenced by participation. As such, the question addressed is how interactions among multiple levels of water governance manifest over time in a participatory intervention. Using a case study in the Rwenzori region in Uganda, this article compares the multi-level interactions before and during a participatory process. The latter has been purposely implemented to bridge gaps between local and provincial levels through a participatory planning process centred on the provincial level. Four types of flows were analyzed: information and knowledge, hydrosocial, financial and human. Our analysis shows that using artefacts like the role-playing game and planning matrix fostered bi-directional information and knowledge flows. Hydrosocial flows did not change in depth but the legitimacy of the two organizations implementing the participatory process was reinforced. Project financial flows were injected through a provincial academic institution, who is not a regular budget recipient. They were therefore superimposed on existing budgeting process. We conclude by providing suggestions for the engineering of participatory processes in order to foster more collaborative and effective multi-level water governance.
More Related Videos
06:00Four Temporary Waterslide Designs Adapted to Different Slope Conditions to Encourage Child Socialization in Playgrounds
Published on: December 9, 2022
11:53Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Quality of Water
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Water and Mineral Acquisition
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Levels of Use of a GIS
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment