Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025
08:24
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
1.0K
Psychological foundations of human status allocation.
Patrick K Durkee1, Aaron W Lukaszewski2, David M Buss3
1Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX 78712; pdurkee@utexas.edu.
Summary
Status hierarchies are primarily built on the ability to generate benefits, not inflict costs. This research supports competence-based theories of status allocation, finding limited evidence for conflict-based models globally.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Sociology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Human status hierarchies are explained by competing theories: competence-based, conflict-based, and dual-pathway models.
- These theories differ in their emphasis on four key affordance dimensions: benefit-generation ability/willingness and cost-infliction ability/willingness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test competing theoretical predictions regarding the centrality of affordance dimensions in status allocation.
- To clarify the foundational principles underlying human status hierarchies across diverse cultural contexts.
Main Methods:
- Examined how perceived benefit-generation and cost-infliction affordances of personal characteristics predict status.
- Utilized data from American raters (n=515) assessing 240 characteristics, validated by international raters (n=2,751) across 14 nations.
Main Results:
- Both benefit-generation and cost-infliction affordances positively correlated with status allocation initially.
- Unique effects of benefit-generation affordances explained significantly more variance in status allocation compared to cost-infliction affordances.
- Cost-infliction affordances showed weak or null predictive power for status allocation when considered alongside benefit-generation.
Conclusions:
- Findings strongly support competence-based theories of status allocation.
- Limited evidence was found for conflict-based and dual-pathway models, suggesting cost-infliction alone does not reliably increase status.
- Perceived ability to generate benefits is a more critical determinant of status across global groups than the ability to inflict costs.
More Related Videos
11:13The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
14.3K
11:51Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
15.5K
Related Concept Videos
01:27Need for Self-Esteem
139
The human need for self-esteem has long intrigued psychologists, leading to the development of several theories that explore its evolutionary and functional significance. Among the most influential are the sociometer, hierometer, and terror management theories. Each offers a unique perspective on why people strive for self-worth and how it shapes behavior and social interaction.Sociometer TheoryAccording to sociometer theory, self-esteem functions as an internal gauge of social acceptance. It...
139
01:27Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
147
Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...
147
01:26Equity Theory
162
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
162
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
13.5K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.5K
01:26Social Exchange Theory
223
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
223
02:06Social Exchange Theory
39.3K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
39.3K