Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpreting R Charts01:22

Interpreting R Charts

248
R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
248
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

6.1K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
6.1K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.8K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.8K
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level01:16

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

13.0K
The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in  probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
13.0K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

5.3K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
5.3K
The R Chart01:02

The R Chart

293
In statistical process control, control charts, particularly R charts, are instrumental in monitoring process variations and identifying non-random patterns that run charts might miss. R charts track the variability within process subgroups, which is crucial when standard deviation use is impractical or unknown process variations exist.
R charts are pivotal for pinpointing shifts in process variability. Stability is indicated when all data points remain within the defined upper and lower...
293

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Control Banding and the Global Rise of Qualitative Risk Assessment Strategies.

Current environmental health reports·2023
Same author

Collection Efficiency Comparison of N95 Respirators Saturated with Artificial Perspiration.

Journal of chemical health & safety·2021
Same author

Quantitative Fit Evaluation of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators and Coronavirus Inactivation Following Heat Treatment.

Annals of work exposures and health·2021
Same author

A Simple Proposition for Improving Industrial Hygiene Air Sampling Methods.

Safety and health at work·2019
Same author

A Quantitative Validation of the Control Banding Nanotool.

Annals of work exposures and health·2019
Same author

Personal exposure to fine particulate air pollution while commuting: An examination of six transport modes on an urban arterial roadway.

PloS one·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 11, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K

Quantitative Validation of Control Bands Using Bayesian Statistical Analyses.

Tyler A McCord1, Matthew T Legaspi2, Elaine A West2

  • 1Environmental Health and Safety Office, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Annals of Work Exposures and Health
|August 22, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Quantitative validation of Similar Exposure Groups (SEGs) confirms existing controls and identifies opportunities to downgrade them. This approach optimizes environmental safety and health resources and improves risk communication for workers.

Keywords:
Bayesian Decision AnalysisControl BandingRisk Level Based Management SystemRisk Level Determination Documentsoccupational risk managementquantitative validationrisk communication

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 11, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Industrial Hygiene
  • Risk Management

Background:

  • Control Banding (CB) strategies are utilized in risk management systems.
  • Similar Exposure Groups (SEGs) are derived from control bands.
  • Quantitative validation is essential for refining CB strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively validate 15 SEGs derived from control bands.
  • To assess the protectiveness of existing controls.
  • To identify SEGs where controls can be downgraded to save resources.

Main Methods:

  • Bayesian Decision Analysis (BDA) was used for statistical analysis.
  • Personal exposure monitoring data was analyzed.
  • 15 SEGs were evaluated for control effectiveness.

Main Results:

  • 93% of SEGs showed implemented controls were adequately protective.
  • 40% of SEGs had overly protective controls, allowing for downgrading.
  • Significant savings in environmental safety and health (ES&H) resources were identified.

Conclusions:

  • Routine quantitative validation of SEGs improves CB accuracy.
  • Downgrading controls in certain SEGs optimizes ES&H resources.
  • Collaborative efforts in CB strategy development and SEGs validation benefit global worker safety.