Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.7K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

447
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
447
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.1K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

717
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
717
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

177
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
177
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

17.1K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
17.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Serological Susceptibility to Measles Among International Students in South Korea After a Cluster of Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Tropical medicine and infectious disease·2026
Same author

Outbreak Investigation of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> Endophthalmitis Following Cataract Surgery in a Private Ophthalmology Clinic in Korea.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Risk Factors for Latent Tuberculosis Identified Using Epidemiological Investigation in Congregate Settings of Gyeongsan City, Republic of Korea (2014-2023).

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Epidemiologic Investigation of a Varicella Outbreak in an Elementary School in Gyeonggi Province, Republic of Korea.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Hwanhon Decoction Ameliorates Cognitive Impairment and Suppresses Neuroinflammation in a Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion Mouse Model: Involvement of Key Genes Identified by Network Pharmacology.

Genes·2025
Same author

Environmental disease monitoring by regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea: a narrative review.

Ewha medical journal·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology.

Kwan Lee1, Chi-Yeon Lim2

  • 1Department of Preventive Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.

Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis
|August 22, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to assess causality between exposures and outcomes, avoiding confounding. This method estimates causal effects reliably by leveraging random genetic assignment.

Keywords:
CausalityConfounding factorsGenetic epidemiologyInstrumentMendelian randomization analysis

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.5K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.5K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Genetic Epidemiology
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Mendelian randomization (MR) is an epidemiological tool utilizing genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs).
  • It aims to infer causal relationships between modifiable exposures and health outcomes, bypassing traditional confounding issues.
  • Genetic variants are robust IVs due to their random inheritance and independence from many environmental exposures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of Mendelian randomization analysis.
  • To explain the application of instrumental variables in estimating causal effects.
  • To highlight MR as a method to control for confounders in observational studies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to estimate causal effects.
  • Applies three core assumptions for valid IVs: independence from confounders, association with exposure, and independence from outcome conditional on exposure.
  • Employs regression techniques to analyze relationships between genetic variants, exposures, and outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Mendelian randomization allows for the estimation of causality free from biases due to confounding.
  • It provides an alternative statistical method to assess the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome.
  • The choice of appropriate genetic instrumental variables is crucial for valid MR analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Mendelian randomization is a powerful approach for causal inference in epidemiology.
  • It effectively mitigates confounding, offering more reliable estimates of exposure-outcome relationships.
  • MR analysis, when conducted rigorously, strengthens the evidence for causality in non-experimental settings.