Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Bilateral low-frequency hearing loss and tinnitus following spinal anesthesia during a cesarean section].

HNO·2026
Same author

Feasibility analysis of an implantable middle ear cavity pressure microphone.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Study Protocol: Psychometric Testing of the German Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life Index-A Multicenter Study on Quality of Life and Patient-Centered Care in Vestibular Schwannoma.

Audiology research·2026
Same author

The Role of Ear Canal Sound Pressure in Bone Conduction Across Different Bone Conduction Devices.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2026
Same author

[<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTATATE uptake in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma predicts SSTR2 expression by immunohistochemistry: Strongest uptake in head and neck paraganglioma.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same author

Phenotypic profiling of neutrophils in acute <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection identifies a TNF-induced activation signature associated with epithelial damage.

Gut microbes·2026
Same journal

Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.8K

Simultaneous Intra- and Extracochlear Electrocochleography During Electrode Insertion.

Adrian Dalbert1,2, Leanne Sijgers1,2, Julian Grosse1,2

  • 1University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Ear and Hearing
|August 23, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) signals during cochlear implant electrode insertion are larger and more variable than extracochlear signals. These changes, related to electrode position, may help detect cochlear trauma.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.5K
Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.8K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.5K
Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Otoacoustic Emissions and Electrophysiology
  • Neurosurgery and Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cochlear implantation requires precise electrode placement.
  • Understanding intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG) signals is crucial for assessing cochlear function during surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To correlate intra- and extracochlear ECochG signals during electrode insertion and removal.
  • To track ECochG signal changes during insertion/removal and correlate them with preoperative hearing.
  • To test the hypothesis that intracochlear ECochG changes are not reflected in extracochlear recordings.

Main Methods:

  • Simultaneous intra- and extracochlear ECochG recordings during stepwise electrode insertion/removal in human cochlear implant recipients.
  • Acoustic stimulus: 500 Hz tone burst at 110-130 dB SPL.
  • Custom-made electrode used for recordings.

Main Results:

  • Intracochlear ECochG responses were consistently larger (mean 14 dB difference) than extracochlear responses.
  • Intracochlear signals showed significant amplitude and phase variations during insertion, unlike stable extracochlear signals.
  • These intracochlear changes were reversible upon electrode retraction.
  • Weak correlations were found between preoperative hearing and ECochG amplitude changes.

Conclusions:

  • Intracochlear ECochG provides larger signals and reveals dynamic changes during electrode insertion not seen with extracochlear recordings.
  • Observed intracochlear signal variations are likely due to electrode movement.
  • Future modeling of these changes could aid in detecting cochlear trauma during implantation.