Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Consistent differences in a virtual world model of ape societies
Bart J Wilson1, Sarah F Brosnan2, Elizabeth V Lonsdorf3
1Economic Science Institute & Smith Institute for Political Economy and Philosophy, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA. bartwilson@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Practical and ethical constraints limit our ability to experimentally test socioecological theory in wild primates. We took an alternate approach to model this, allowing groups of humans to interact in a virtual world in which they had to find food and interact with both ingroup and outgroup avatars to earn rewards. We altered ratios and distributions of high- and low-value foods to test the hypothesis that hominoids vary with regards to social cohesion and intergroup tolerance due to their feeding ecology. We found larger nesting clusters and decreased attacks on outgroup competitors in the Bonobo condition versus the Chimpanzee condition, suggesting a significant effect of feeding competition alone on social structure. We also demonstrate that virtual worlds are a robust mechanism for testing hypotheses that are impossible to study in the wild.
More Related Videos
07:34Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
08:42Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
Published on: May 5, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Modeling and Similitude
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Naturalistic Observations
Evolutionary Psychology
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Typical Model Studies