Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
A comparison of meta-methods for synthesizing indirect effects.
Camiel H J van Zundert1, Milica Miočević1
1Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Synthesizing indirect effects is crucial for understanding mechanisms. Correlation-based MASEM demonstrated the best performance in a simulation study, showing lower bias and superior interval estimates compared to other methods.
Area of Science:
- Psychometrics
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Understanding the indirect (mediated) effects of variables is essential for elucidating causal mechanisms.
- Synthesizing findings on indirect effects across multiple studies is a complex statistical challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of six different methods for synthesizing indirect effects.
- To provide empirical examples and code for applying these synthesis methods.
- To offer guidelines for best practices in synthesizing indirect effects.
Main Methods:
- A simulation study was conducted to evaluate correlation-based meta-analysis of structural equation models (MASEM), parameter-based MASEM, marginal likelihood synthesis, adjusted marginal likelihood synthesis, univariate methods, and two-parameter sequential Bayesian methods.
- Methods were compared based on bias, precision, root mean square error (RMSE) of point estimates, and power, coverage, and type I error rates of interval estimates.
- Simulation factors included the synthesis method, indirect effect strength, independent variable measurement level, and number of studies.
Main Results:
- Correlation-based MASEM exhibited the lowest bias and the best statistical properties for interval estimates.
- Marginal likelihood synthesis showed high power but poor coverage and type I error rates.
- Adjusted marginal likelihood synthesis and two-parameter sequential Bayesian methods performed adequately, with adjusted marginal likelihood synthesis offering higher power.
- Overall, correlation-based MASEM was the top-performing method.
Conclusions:
- Correlation-based MASEM is recommended as the optimal method for synthesizing indirect effects due to its superior performance.
- Guidelines for optimal practices, including the number of studies and reporting standards, are provided.
- Suggestions for future methodological research in indirect effect synthesis are outlined.
Related Concept Videos
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Inductive Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
Adrenergic Agonists: Indirect-Acting Agents
One mechanism involves depleting stored catecholamines by displacing them from synaptic vesicles. These agents, known as "displacers," are transported into vesicles at the expense of noradrenaline. Examples include amphetamine and tyramine, which lack a catechol moiety, resulting in prolonged action, improved oral...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...

