Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Imaging the testis: comparison between MR imaging and US.

S Thurnher1, H Hricak, P R Carroll

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco 94143.

Radiology
|June 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of FDG-PET/CT in the management of patients with vulvar and vaginal cancer.

Gynecologic oncology·2016
Same author

Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference.

European radiology·2015
Same author

Volume-based quantitative FDG PET/CT metrics and their association with optimal debulking and progression-free survival in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery.

European radiology·2015
Same author

Retraction note to: new horizons in genitourinary oncologic imaging.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same author

Combined PET/MR: The Real Work Has Just Started. Summary Report of the Third International Workshop on PET/MR Imaging; February 17-21, 2014, Tübingen, Germany.

Molecular imaging and biology·2015
Same author

Volume and landmark analysis: comparison of MRI measurements obtained with an endorectal coil and with a phased-array coil.

Clinical radiology·2015

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging shows potential for diagnosing testicular tumors, especially diffuse infiltrating types missed by ultrasonography (US). However, both MR imaging and US have limitations in differentiating tumor types and accurate staging.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Testicular tumors require accurate diagnosis and staging for effective treatment.
  • Conventional imaging modalities like ultrasonography (US) are primary tools but have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic and local staging capabilities of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for testicular tumors.
  • To compare MR imaging findings with ultrasonography (US) and surgical-histologic results.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 23 patients with testicular abnormalities who underwent surgery or biopsy.
  • Comparison of MR imaging findings with US and subsequent surgical-histologic correlation.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • MR imaging and US correctly distinguished between intra- and extratesticular abnormalities.
  • US missed four cases of diffuse infiltrating intratesticular tumors, which MR imaging identified.
  • Neither modality could differentiate benign from malignant testicular disorders.
  • Local tumor staging accuracy was limited for both MR imaging (7/11 true positives) and US (5/11 true positives).

    • Conclusions:

    • Ultrasonography (US) remains the primary imaging modality for testicular disease.
    • MR imaging is valuable when physical examination and US findings are discordant or when diffuse infiltrative testicular tumors are suspected.