Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pancreatic transplant imaging.

W T Yuh1, J A Wiese, M M Abu-Yousef

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242.

Radiology
|June 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ibrutinib monotherapy for relapse or refractory primary CNS lymphoma and primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: Final analysis of the phase II 'proof-of-concept' iLOC study by the Lymphoma study association (LYSA) and the French oculo-cerebral lymphoma (LOC) network.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2019
Same author

Purified Human Pancreatic Islets, CIT Culture Media with Lisofylline or Exenatide.

CellR4-- repair, replacement, regeneration, & reprogramming·2019
Same author

Are IPL home devices really foolproof?

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2015
Same author

Regional variability in liver waiting list removals causes false ascertainment of waiting list deaths.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2013
Same author

Multiple diagnostic task performance in CT examination of the chest.

The British journal of radiology·2012
Same author

Multiple diagnostic task performance in CT examination of the chest.

The British journal of radiology·2012
Same journal

Noncontrast Abbreviated MRI for Post-TACE Treatment Response Monitoring of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Ancillary Features from LI-RADS.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Response Evaluation Criteria in Bone Metastases: Performance and Association of Response Classifications with Survival Outcomes.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Entropy for Prediction of MACEs in Myocarditis: A Cardiac MRI-based Biomarker of Myocardial Tissue Heterogeneity.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

AI for Radiology: A Primer Part II. Interacting with AI Results.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Hyperdense Capsule Sign at Noncontrast CT as an Indication for Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Nonacute Subdural Hematomas: A MAGIC-MT Trial Post Hoc Analysis.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Sawtooth Cardiomyopathy: The Tiger Heart.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

Ultrasound (US), nuclear medicine, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are sensitive methods for detecting pancreatic transplant rejection. These imaging techniques complement clinical evaluation and help identify fluid collections and assess graft perfusion.

Area of Science:

  • Transplant Surgery
  • Diagnostic Imaging
  • Nephrology

Background:

  • Pancreatic transplantation is a vital treatment for select patients with type 1 diabetes.
  • Monitoring for graft rejection is crucial for long-term transplant success.
  • Accurate diagnostic tools are needed to differentiate rejection from other complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To retrospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of nuclear medicine, ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in detecting pancreatic transplant rejection.
  • To assess the utility of these imaging modalities in identifying complications such as fluid collections.
  • To determine if imaging findings correlate with clinical assessments of rejection.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 44 clinical episodes in 17 pancreatic transplant recipients.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Correlation of clinical impressions of rejection with results from nuclear medicine (19 studies), US (12 studies), and MR imaging (44 studies).

    • Main Results:

    • Ultrasound (US) demonstrated 82% sensitivity for rejection detection and identified fluid collections.
    • Nuclear medicine imaging showed 86% sensitivity and provided crucial physiologic information on graft perfusion.
    • MR imaging achieved 100% sensitivity and 76% specificity in predicting rejection and detected pathologic fluid collections.

    Conclusions:

    • Nuclear medicine, US, and MR imaging are all sensitive methods for detecting pancreatic transplant rejection.
    • These imaging modalities are valuable, complementary tools for the clinical evaluation of pancreatic transplant recipients.
    • Imaging aids in identifying graft rejection, assessing perfusion, and detecting fluid collections.