Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Efficacy of Bolus Calculation and Advanced Carbohydrate Counting in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Merete B Christensen1,2, Nermin Serifovski1,2, Anne M H Herz1
1Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Insights
Advanced carbohydrate counting (ACC) and automated bolus calculators (ABCs) effectively reduced HbA1c in type 2 diabetes. Both methods, including manual calculation, improved glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemia.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Diseases
- Diabetes Management
Background:
- Limited evidence exists on the efficacy of carbohydrate counting and automated bolus calculators (ABCs) for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.
- Type 2 diabetes management often involves basal-bolus insulin therapy, requiring precise insulin dosing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of advanced carbohydrate counting (ACC) and automated bolus calculators (ABCs) compared to manual insulin bolus calculation (MC) in type 2 diabetes patients on basal-bolus insulin.
- To assess changes in HbA1c, glycemic variability, hypoglycemia, and body mass index (BMI).
Main Methods:
- A 24-week, open-label, randomized clinical study involving 79 individuals with type 2 diabetes on basal-bolus insulin.
- Participants were randomized to either an ABC group (trained in ACC and ABC use) or an MC group (trained in ACC and manual calculation).
- Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was used at baseline and study end to assess glycemic parameters.
Main Results:
- Both the ABC and MC groups achieved a significant reduction in HbA1c (0.8%) with no significant difference between the groups.
- Glycemic variability decreased significantly in both groups.
- No increase in hypoglycemia or BMI was observed, and treatment satisfaction improved in both groups.
Conclusions:
- Advanced carbohydrate counting (ACC) is an effective, low-cost strategy for reducing HbA1c and glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes patients on basal-bolus insulin.
- The use of automated bolus calculators (ABCs) offers similar benefits to manual calculation in this population, without increasing hypoglycemia or BMI.
- Both ACC and insulin bolus calculation methods enhance treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes management.
Abstract:
Carbohydrate counting and use of automated bolus calculators (ABCs) can help reduce HbA1c in type 1 diabetes but only limited evidence exists in type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the efficacy of advanced carbohydrate counting (ACC) and use of an ABC compared with manual insulin bolus calculation (MC) in persons with type 2 diabetes. A 24-week open-label, randomized clinical study was conducted in 79 persons with type 2 diabetes treated with basal-bolus insulin (mean age 62.5 ± 9.6 years, HbA1c 8.7% ± 1.0% [72 ± 11 mmol/mol], diabetes duration 18.7 ± 7.6 years). Participants were randomized 1:1 into two groups: ABC group received training in ACC and use of an ABC; MC group received training in ACC and manual calculation of insulin bolus. Participants wore blinded continuous glucose monitors for 6 days at baseline and at study end. Primary endpoint was change in HbA1c. After 24 weeks, HbA1c decreased 0.8% (8.8 mmol/mol) in ABC group and 0.8% (9.0 mmol/mol) in MC group with no between-group difference (P = 0.96) and without increase in time in hypoglycemic range (sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L). Glycemic variability decreased significantly in both groups, whereas the total insulin dose and body mass index (BMI) remained unchanged during the study. Treatment satisfaction increased significantly in both groups after 24 weeks. ACC is an effective, low-cost tool to reduce HbA1c and glycemic variability in persons with basal-bolus insulin-treated type 2 diabetes without increase in hypoglycemia or BMI. Similar effects were seen with use of an ABC and with use of manual bolus calculation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02887898.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Clearance
In the one-compartment open model for intravenous (IV) bolus administration, clearance is estimated by dividing the elimination rate by the plasma drug concentration. This equation leverages the elimination rate constant and the apparent...
Carbohydrate Metabolism
Starch accounts for approximately 60% of the carbohydrates consumed by humans. Since amylase enzymes cannot function in the stomach's acidic environment, starch can only be digested in the mouth and small intestine. Simple sugars are found naturally in milk and fruits in...
Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Bolus Administration
The disparity between drug input and the sum of drug transfer rates between...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational

