Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Usefulness of Proximal Coronary Wave Speed for Wave Intensity Analysis in Diseased Coronary Vessels
Lorena Casadonte1, Jan Baan2, Jan J Piek2
1Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Insights
Proximal wave speed can accurately assess coronary artery function distal to blockages. This method allows for better analysis of wave intensity in diseased vessels, improving diagnostic capabilities.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Hemodynamics
Background:
- Wave speed is crucial for separating forward and backward traveling wave intensity components in coronary arteries.
- Assessing wave speed distal to a stenosis is challenging due to altered hemodynamic conditions.
- Arterial wall properties, influencing wave speed, are assumed to be consistent proximal and distal to stenoses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that proximal wave speed can be used to analyze wave intensity distal to a coronary artery stenosis.
- To evaluate the accuracy of the sum-of-squares single-point technique (SPc) for measuring coronary wave speed in diseased and healthy arteries.
Main Methods:
- Coronary wave speed (SPc) was measured using simultaneous intracoronary pressure and flow velocity data.
- SPc was assessed proximal and distal to stenoses in 12 patients and in 14 healthy reference vessels.
- Measurements were repeated distal to the stenosis after revascularization in seven patients.
Main Results:
- No difference in SPc was observed between proximal and distal locations in reference vessels.
- In diseased vessels, distal SPc was paradoxically higher than proximal SPc (28.4 vs. 18.3 m/s), leading to underestimation of wave energy.
- Post-revascularization, distal SPc normalized and no longer differed from proximal SPc, with wave energy calculations becoming consistent.
Conclusions:
- Distal hemodynamic measurements in diseased coronary arteries lead to erroneously elevated wave speed (SPc) assessments.
- Proximal wave speed measurements provide a reliable method for analyzing wave intensity downstream of a stenosis.
- This approach has the potential to expand the utility of wave intensity analysis in the study of diseased coronary arteries.
Abstract:
Background: Wave speed is needed to separate net wave intensity into forward and backward traveling components. However, wave speed in diseased coronary arteries cannot be assessed from hemodynamic measurements obtained distal to a stenosis. Wave speed inherently depends on arterial wall properties which should be similar proximal and distal to a stenosis. Our hypothesis is that proximal wave speed can be used to separate net wave intensity obtained distal to a stenosis. Methods: We assessed coronary wave speed using the sum-of-squares single-point technique (SPc) based on simultaneous intracoronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in human coronary arteries. SPc at resting flow was determined in diseased coronary vessels of 12 patients both proximal and distal to the stenosis. In seven of these vessels, distal measurements were additionally obtained after revascularization by stent placement. SPc was also assessed at two axial locations in 14 reference vessels without a stenosis. Results: (1) No difference in SPc was present between proximal and distal locations in the reference vessels. (2) In diseased vessels with a focal stenosis, SPc at the distal location was paradoxically larger than SPc proximal to the stenosis (28.4 ± 3.7 m/s vs. 18.3 ± 1.8 m/s, p < 0.02), despite the lower distending pressure downstream of the stenosis. The corresponding separated wave energy tended to be underestimated when derived from SPc at the distal compared with the proximal location. (3) After successful revascularization, SPc at the distal location no longer differed from SPc at the proximal location prior to revascularization (21.9 ± 2.0 m/s vs. 20.8 ± 1.9 m/s, p = 0.48). Accordingly, no significant difference in separated wave energy was observed for forward or backward waves. Conclusion: In diseased coronary vessels, SPc assessed from distal hemodynamic signals is erroneously elevated. Our findings suggest that proximal wave speed can be used to separate wave intensity profiles obtained downstream of a stenosis. This approach may extend the application of wave intensity analysis to diseased coronary vessels.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction

