Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Preemptive percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease: identification of the appropriate
Zhongyue Pu1, Diaa Hakim, Kevin Croce
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Insights
Preemptive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for nonculprit lesions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients reduces major adverse cardiac events (MACE). This approach may benefit other coronary syndromes by targeting high-risk plaques.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Atherosclerosis Research
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) management traditionally focuses on revascularization of obstructive lesions causing ischemia to prevent major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
- Recent studies suggest preemptive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on nonculprit lesions (NCLs) may offer additional benefits.
- The role of NCLs in MACE and the optimal strategy for intervention remain areas of active investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the concept and evidence for preemptive PCI of NCLs in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- To discuss the mechanistic benefits of preemptive PCI for NCLs.
- To explore the potential value of preemptive PCI for other coronary syndromes beyond STEMI.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical trial data, including the COMPLETE and ISCHEMIA trials.
- Analysis of outcomes related to preemptive PCI in STEMI and stable CAD populations.
- Discussion of plaque characteristics and their association with MACE.
Main Results:
- In STEMI patients, preemptive PCI of high-risk NCLs, even those not causing significant ischemia, reduced MACE.
- The benefit of preemptive PCI in STEMI was observed in lesions with high-risk plaque characteristics, irrespective of ischemia severity.
- In stable CAD, increased atherosclerotic burden correlated with higher MACE, but PCI of ischemia-producing lesions alone did not improve outcomes compared to optimal medical therapy.
Conclusions:
- Preemptive PCI of high-risk NCLs improves long-term MACE in STEMI patients.
- Adverse events in stable CAD may originate from high-risk plaques distinct from the primary ischemia-producing lesion.
- Identifying and preemptively treating highest-risk atherosclerotic lesions could reduce future MACE across various coronary syndromes.
Purpose Of Review:
Management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) has been based on identification of a coronary obstruction causing ischemia and performing a revascularization procedure to reduce that ischemia, with the goal of thereby preventing subsequent major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in that vascular territory. Recent investigations demonstrate that preemptive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of nonculprit coronary lesions (NCLs) that may not cause ischemia in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) reduces MACE. In this review, we focus on preemptive PCI, discuss its mechanistic benefits and speculate on its potential value for other coronary syndromes.
Recent Findings:
The COMPLETE trial in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI demonstrated that preemptive PCI of NCL obstructions, which may not cause ischemia, but often exhibit high-risk OCT plaque characteristics, reduced cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Reduction in MACE from preemptive PCI of NCL was similar for lesions confirmed to cause ischemia (fractional flow reserve <0.80) and for lesions that were only visually assessed to have luminal obstruction at least 70%.The ISCHEMIA trial in patients with stable CAD and moderate/severe ischemia demonstrated that MACE risk increased progressively with more extensive atherosclerosis, but that performing PCI of ischemia-producing lesions did not reduce MACE. Adverse cardiac events likely originated in high-risk plaque areas not treated with PCI.
Summary:
In STEMI patients, preemptive PCI of high-risk NCL that may not cause ischemia improves long-term MACE. In stable CAD patients, MACE increases as the atherosclerotic burden increases, but PCI of the ischemia-producing lesion itself does not improve outcomes compared with optimal medical therapy. Adverse events likely originate in high-risk plaque areas that are distinct from ischemia-producing obstructions. Identification of highest-risk atherosclerotic lesions responsible for future MACE may provide an opportunity for preemptive PCI in patients with a variety of coronary syndromes.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

