Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the Dorsal Skin of Hamsters: a Useful Model for the Screening of Antileishmanial Drugs
Published on: April 21, 2012
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
Mariona Pinart1, José-Ramón Rueda2, Gustavo As Romero3
1Free time independent Cochrane reviewer, Berlin, Germany.
This review on American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACML) treatments found that intramuscular meglumine antimoniate (IMMA) and oral miltefosine likely increase cure rates. However, miltefosine is associated with more nausea and vomiting. Further research is needed for mucosal leishmaniasis.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Parasitology
- Dermatology
Background:
- American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (ACML) are caused by Leishmania parasites.
- Pentavalent antimonials are the primary treatment, but alternative interventions require effectiveness and safety reviews.
- This study updates a 2009 Cochrane Review on ACML interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness and safety of interventions for ACML in immunocompetent individuals.
- To evaluate treatments for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.
Main Methods:
- Updated systematic search of multiple databases and trials registers up to August 2019.
- Included 75 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 6533 participants with ACML.
- Assessed cure rates, adverse effects, and recurrence using GRADE to determine evidence certainty.
Main Results:
- Intramuscular meglumine antimoniate (IMMA) may increase cure rates but likely increases severe adverse effects like myalgias and arthralgias.
- Oral miltefosine probably improves cure rates but significantly increases nausea and vomiting compared to placebo.
- Compared to IMMA, oral miltefosine showed similar cure rates but higher rates of nausea and vomiting; azithromycin likely reduced cure rates.
Conclusions:
- Evidence certainty for most comparisons was moderate or low, limiting conclusive findings.
- Both IMMA and oral miltefosine likely improve cure rates, with miltefosine causing more gastrointestinal side effects.
- Future research should focus on mucosal leishmaniasis treatments and evaluate ACML recurrence and progression.
More Related Videos
06:57In Vivo Infection with Leishmania amazonensis to Evaluate Parasite Virulence in Mice
Published on: February 20, 2020
12:22A Parasite Rescue and Transformation Assay for Antileishmanial Screening Against Intracellular Leishmania donovani Amastigotes in THP1 Human Acute Monocytic Leukemia Cell Line
Published on: December 30, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Skin Diseases and Disorders
Gram-positive Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. are responsible for many of the most common skin infections. However, many...
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...