Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

05:05
Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration
Published on: November 23, 2019
8.3K
Towards Estimating the Uncertainty Associated with Three-Dimensional Geometry Reconstructed from Medical Image Data
Marc Horner1, Stephen M Luke2, Kerim O Genc3
1ANSYS, Inc., Evanston, IL.
Summary
Image artifacts and segmentation variability can impact patient-specific treatment plans. This study quantifies measurement errors in medical imaging, finding up to 4% error in physical scans, highlighting the need for uncertainty estimation in digital image analysis.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging and Image Analysis
- Computational Modeling
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Patient-specific computational modeling relies heavily on accurate medical imaging for treatment planning.
- Image artifacts and segmentation processes introduce variability and potential inaccuracies in anatomical data extraction.
- Quantifying uncertainty in medical image analysis is crucial for reliable patient-specific treatment plans.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and analyze image datasets to estimate the uncertainty associated with extracting anatomical data from medical images.
- To assess the impact of image artifacts and segmentation variability on the accuracy of anatomical measurements.
- To investigate methods for improving segmentation accuracy in medical image analysis.
Main Methods:
- Development of two image datasets: one from a "virtual voxelization" of a CAD model (idealized) and another from CT scanning of physical spherical phantoms.
- Standard image analysis procedures were applied to extract anatomical data.
- Investigation of established thresholding procedures to enhance segmentation accuracy.
Main Results:
- For the idealized sphere, diameter error was ≤2% with 5+ voxels across the diameter.
- Measurement error increased to approximately 4% for physical phantoms with similar voxelization.
- Thresholding procedures were adapted to explore improvements in segmentation accuracy.
Conclusions:
- Image acquisition artifacts and segmentation variability introduce measurable errors in anatomical data extraction.
- The study quantifies the impact of these errors, showing higher uncertainty in physical scans compared to idealized models.
- Accurate estimation of uncertainty is essential for reliable patient-specific computational modeling and treatment planning.

