Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming01:24

Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming

2.0K
Nuclear reprogramming is a process of transforming one cell type into an unrelated cell type by epigenetic changes that alter the cell’s original gene expression pattern. Such epigenetic changes force cells to express a different set of genes, which play a significant role in inducing transformation into other cell types. Nuclear reprogramming offers applications in reproductive cloning for livestock propagation and regenerative medicine — developing patient-specific cells for...
2.0K
Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming01:29

Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming

2.5K
Reprogramming alters the gene expression in somatic cells, transforming them into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells over several generations. Scientists can reprogram cells by introducing genes for four transcription factors—Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM) by viral or non-viral methods. These factors are also known as Yamanaka factors after Shinya Yamanaka, who first generated iPS cells using mouse skin cells. Yamanaka was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2012...
2.5K
Chromatin Modification in iPS Cells01:32

Chromatin Modification in iPS Cells

2.1K
Chromatin modification alters gene expression; therefore, scientists can add histone-modifying enzymes, histone variants, and chromatin remodeling complexes to somatic cells to aid reprogramming into pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.
Compact chromatin makes reprogramming difficult. Enzymes, such as histone demethylases and acetyltransferases, are often added during reprogramming to loosen the chromatin, making the DNA more accessible to transcription factors. Molecules that inhibit histone...
2.1K
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells01:13

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

26.6K
Stem cells are undifferentiated cells that divide and produce different types of cells. Ordinarily, cells that have differentiated into a specific cell type are post-mitotic—that is, they no longer divide. However, scientists have found a way to reprogram these mature cells so that they “de-differentiate” and return to an unspecialized, proliferative state. These cells are also pluripotent like embryonic stem cells—able to produce all cell types—and are therefore...
26.6K
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells01:06

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

5.1K
Stem cells are undifferentiated cells that divide and produce different cell types. Ordinarily, cells that have differentiated into a specific cell type are terminally differentiated; however, scientists have found a way to reprogram these mature cells so that they dedifferentiate and return to an unspecialized, proliferative state. These cells are pluripotent like embryonic stem cells—able to produce all cell types—and are called induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).
Somatic...
5.1K
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks02:37

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

6.1K
DNA replication is initiated at sites containing predefined DNA sequences known as origins of replication. DNA is unwound at these sites by the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and other factors such as Cdc45 and the associated GINS complex.The unwound single strands are protected by replication protein A (RPA) until DNA polymerase starts synthesizing DNA at the 5’ end of the strand in the same direction as the replication fork. To prevent the replication fork from falling apart,...
6.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Small molecule activators of the mitochondrial protease ClpP induce senescence in triple-negative breast cancer cells and sensitize cells to the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax.

Cell death & disease·2026
Same author

The RNA binding protein ZFP36L2 displays tissue-selective mRNA targeting in mice.

RNA biology·2026
Same author

Dordaviprone/ONC201 Activation of the ClpP Mitochondrial Protease Inhibits the Growth of KRAS-Mutant Pancreatic Cancer and Overcomes RAS Inhibitor Resistance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Defining the MYC-regulated transcriptome and kinome that support KRAS- and ERK-dependent growth of pancreatic cancer.

Science signaling·2025
Same author

Combining rehabilitation nursing with nutritional intervention to improve self-care ability and nutritional status in elderly stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Journal of health, population, and nutrition·2025
Same author

BAHCC1 binds H4K20me1 to facilitate the MCM complex loading and DNA replication.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Frozen Buffy Coats using Non-integrating Episomal Plasmids
10:52

Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Frozen Buffy Coats using Non-integrating Episomal Plasmids

Published on: June 5, 2015

13.4K

Programming pluripotent stem cells: Can't teach an old cell new DNA replication tricks.

Brandon L Mouery1, Liu Mei2, Jeanette Gowen Cook1,2

  • 1Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

The Journal of Cell Biology
|August 29, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) show varied differentiation efficiencies based on their reprogramming method. Lower potential PSCs retain somatic DNA replication features and experience increased DNA damage, impacting their developmental capacity.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Reprogramming Cancer Cells to iPSCs to Study Disease Progression and Treatment Targets
07:08

Author Spotlight: Reprogramming Cancer Cells to iPSCs to Study Disease Progression and Treatment Targets

Published on: February 2, 2024

1.2K
Chemical Reversion of Conventional Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to a Naïve-like State with Improved Multilineage Differentiation Potency
09:07

Chemical Reversion of Conventional Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to a Naïve-like State with Improved Multilineage Differentiation Potency

Published on: June 10, 2018

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Frozen Buffy Coats using Non-integrating Episomal Plasmids
10:52

Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Frozen Buffy Coats using Non-integrating Episomal Plasmids

Published on: June 5, 2015

13.4K
Author Spotlight: Reprogramming Cancer Cells to iPSCs to Study Disease Progression and Treatment Targets
07:08

Author Spotlight: Reprogramming Cancer Cells to iPSCs to Study Disease Progression and Treatment Targets

Published on: February 2, 2024

1.2K
Chemical Reversion of Conventional Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to a Naïve-like State with Improved Multilineage Differentiation Potency
09:07

Chemical Reversion of Conventional Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to a Naïve-like State with Improved Multilineage Differentiation Potency

Published on: June 10, 2018

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cell Biology
  • Stem Cell Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) are crucial for regenerative medicine and developmental studies.
  • The efficiency of PSC differentiation varies significantly, influenced by reprogramming techniques.
  • Understanding factors limiting differentiation is key to improving stem cell therapies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying differential differentiation efficiencies in PSCs.
  • To identify specific cellular characteristics associated with lower differentiation potential in PSCs.
  • To explore the relationship between DNA replication and DNA damage in PSC differentiation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of DNA replication origin utilization in PSCs with varying differentiation potentials.
  • Assessment of DNA damage markers and frequencies in different PSC populations.
  • Functional assays to evaluate the differentiation capacity of PSCs.

Main Results:

  • PSCs with lower differentiation potential exhibit DNA replication origin utilization patterns similar to somatic cells.
  • These cells demonstrate a higher incidence of DNA damage compared to more potent PSCs.
  • The observed DNA replication and damage patterns correlate with reduced differentiation efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • Somatic DNA replication characteristics in PSCs are linked to impaired differentiation capacity.
  • Accumulation of DNA damage may contribute to the reduced potential of certain PSC lines.
  • These findings offer insights into improving PSC reprogramming and differentiation protocols.