Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025
Laparoscopy-endoscopy Cooperative Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
Published on: February 19, 2022
Do microscopic surgical margins matter for primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor?
Adrienne B Shannon1, Yun Song1, Douglas L Fraker2
1Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Background:
Although tumor size and mitotic rate are established prognostic factors for worse survival in patients undergoing surgical resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors, the impact of microscopic margins, or R1 resection, is not completely established.
Methods:
Patients who received no neoadjuvant therapy and underwent surgical resection for stage I to III gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors were identified from the 2010 to 2013 National Cancer Database and divided into 2 cohorts, R0 and R1 resections. Cox proportional hazards ratio and Kaplan Meier survival estimates were utilized to analyze 5-y overall survival.
Results:
Of 2,084 patients, those with R1 resection (57, 2.7%) were more likely to have tumors >10 cm (28.1% vs 11.9%, odds ratio 3.51, P = .017) and stage III disease (26.3% vs 11.2%, odds ratio 2.26, P = .047). Although margin status was associated with higher risk tumors, it was not associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy. After multivariate Cox regression, R1 and R0 patients did not have a difference in 5-y overall survival (82.5% vs 88.6%, hazards ratio 1.26, P = .49). When stratified by stage of disease, there remained no difference in survival across all stages when comparing R1 and R0 patients.
Conclusion:
Positive microscopic margins are uncommon but do not appear to impact survival outcomes in patients with resected localized gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
