Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

98.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
98.8K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

202
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
202
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.2K
Linear Approximation in Time Domain01:21

Linear Approximation in Time Domain

240
Nonlinear systems often require sophisticated approaches for accurate modeling and analysis, with state-space representation being particularly effective. This method is especially useful for systems where variables and parameters vary with time or operating conditions, such as in a simple pendulum or a translational mechanical system with nonlinear springs.
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length,...
240
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

177
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
177
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

3.9K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nonparametric Density Estimation of a Long-Term Trend from Repeated Semicontinuous Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same author

Generative AI-assisted Bayesian-frequentist Hybrid Inference in Single-cell RNA Sequencing Analysis for Genes Associated with Alzheimer's Disease.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Application of the Total Nutrient Index as a Precision Nutrition Tool to Address Dietary Recommendations Across the Life Course.

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics·2026
Same author

Valid and efficient inference for nonparametric variable importance in two-phase studies.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Accelerometer measurement error in a randomized physical activity intervention trial in breast cancer survivors was nondifferential but attenuated the intervention effect.

The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity·2025
Same author

Methods matter for dietary supplement exposure assessment: comparing prevalence, product types, and amounts of nutrients from dietary supplements in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in the American Association of Retired Persons cohort study.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K

MALMEM: model averaging in linear measurement error models.

Xinyu Zhang1, Yanyuan Ma2, Raymond J Carroll3

  • 1University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology
|September 1, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new model averaging method for linear regression with measurement error. The approach optimizes covariate selection, outperforming existing methods in simulations and health study applications.

Keywords:
Measurement errorModel averagingModel selectionOptimalityWeight

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Econometrics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Linear regression models are widely used but can be inaccurate with measurement error in covariates.
  • Standard methods struggle when true covariates are unobserved, preventing direct loss function calculation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust model averaging estimation method for linear regression with unobserved covariates affected by measurement error.
  • To create a weight choice criterion that is asymptotically equivalent to the optimal unknown model average estimator.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel weight choice criterion based on the explicit form of parameter estimators.
  • Utilized simulation studies to compare the proposed method against established Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) methods.
  • Applied the method to a real-world health study.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method achieves optimality in minimizing relative loss when the true model is absent.
  • It estimates model parameters at a root-n rate when the true model is included.
  • Simulation results demonstrate superior performance compared to existing BIC and AIC model selection and averaging techniques.

Conclusions:

  • The novel model averaging method effectively handles measurement error in linear regression when true covariates are unobserved.
  • The technique offers improved accuracy and optimality in model parameter estimation.
  • The method shows practical utility, as demonstrated by its application in a health research context.