Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
12.0K
Intergroup Contact Reduces Dehumanization and Meta-Dehumanization: Cross-Sectional, Longitudinal, and
Emile Bruneau1,2, Boaz Hameiri1,2, Samantha L Moore-Berg1,2
1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|September 1, 2020
Summary
Positive intergroup contact reduces dehumanization and meta-dehumanization. This study shows that quality interactions decrease prejudice and the perception of outgroup hostility, benefiting intergroup relations.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Intergroup Relations
- Prejudice Reduction
Background:
- Dehumanization of outgroups and meta-dehumanization (perceiving outgroups as dehumanizing the ingroup) are significant barriers to positive intergroup relations.
- Understanding the factors that mitigate these negative perceptions is crucial for fostering social harmony.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the impact of intergroup contact on both the blatant dehumanization of outgroups and the perception of meta-dehumanization.
- To investigate the role of contact quality in these processes across diverse samples and methodologies.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of 12 survey samples (N=5,388) across five countries.
- A longitudinal study (N=1,103) examining contact quality and subsequent dehumanization.
- A quasi-experimental study (N=487) involving virtual intergroup contact.
Main Results:
- Meta-analysis revealed a consistent effect of contact quality on reducing dehumanization and meta-dehumanization.
- Longitudinal data indicated that higher quality contact predicted lower dehumanization and meta-dehumanization six months later.
- Virtual contact significantly reduced dehumanization and perceived meta-dehumanization among American students.
Conclusions:
- The quality of intergroup contact is a robust predictor of reduced dehumanization and meta-dehumanization.
- Both direct and virtual forms of sustained contact can effectively mitigate negative intergroup perceptions.
- Findings underscore the importance of promoting positive intergroup interactions for prejudice reduction.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Groups on Groups
160
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
160
Deindividuation
30.0K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
30.0K
In- and Out-Groups
42.8K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.8K
Stereotype Content Model
15.2K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.2K
Robbers Cave
14.6K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.6K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
94.5K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
94.5K

