Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

643
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
643
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.9K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.6K
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

247
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
247
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

449
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
449

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Right amygdala ablation reduces maladaptive negative interpretation bias and symptoms in a patient with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Computational neural dynamics of goal-directed visual attention in macaques.

Science advances·2026
Same author

COVID vaccination and economic game decisions: The role of analytical thinking.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2026
Same author

Computational single-neuron mechanisms of visual object coding in the human temporal lobe.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Characterization of the spatiotemporal representations of visual, semantic, and memorability features in the human brain.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Charting brain morphology in international healthy and neurological populations.

Nature neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.3K

Outcome saliency modulates behavioral decision switching.

Sai Sun1, Rongjun Yu2, Shuo Wang3

  • 1Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science of Guangdong Province, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China. sunsai1215@gmail.com.

Scientific Reports
|September 2, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Making decisions involves learning from feedback. This study shows that emphasizing specific outcomes, like wins or losses, changes how people switch choices and how the brain processes these signals.

More Related Videos

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

67
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.3K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

67
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Goal-directed decision-making relies on evaluating outcomes and learning from feedback.
  • The impact of outcome saliency on decision strategies and neural encoding is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how outcome saliency influences decision strategies, specifically choice switching.
  • To explore the neural mechanisms underlying the encoding of outcome saliency signals.

Main Methods:

  • A two-alternative forced choice gambling task was used to quantify decision switching behavior.
  • Three experiments manipulated outcome saliency (win/loss vs. correct/incorrect) and its emphasis.
  • Simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) recorded neural activity during the task.

Main Results:

  • Participants switched choices more after incorrect than correct trials; win/loss did not significantly differ initially.
  • Highlighting specific outcome dimensions (utility or performance) amplified switching frequency differences.
  • Non-specific saliency emphasis abolished these effects.
  • EEG data revealed that feedback-related negativity, P300, and late positive potential encoded saliency modulation.
  • Frontal and parietal theta-band power encoded salient outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Specific outcome saliency modulates behavioral decision switching.
  • Neural signatures, including specific EEG components and theta-band power, encode outcome saliency.
  • Outcome saliency influences information weighting during evaluation, impacting future decisions.