Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Timing and evolution of advanced conduction disturbances in patients with right bundle branch block undergoing
Guillem Muntané-Carol1, David Del Val1, Lucía Junquera1
1Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Insights
Advanced conduction disturbances (CDs) are common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB), often occurring within 3 days and rarely recovering. This highlights the need for careful monitoring and planning for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Electrophysiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a growing procedure for aortic stenosis.
- Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is a common baseline electrocardiographic finding.
- The impact of pre-existing RBBB on conduction disturbances (CDs) post-TAVR requires further elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the timing and long-term evolution of advanced CDs in patients with baseline RBBB undergoing TAVR.
- To assess the rate and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 110 patients with pre-existing RBBB undergoing TAVR was analyzed.
- Arrhythmias were recorded during hospitalization, with follow-up at 30 days, 1 year, and annually thereafter.
- Conduction recovery and ventricular pacing percentage (VPP) were evaluated at 30 days for patients with PPMI.
Main Results:
- Over half (55.5%) of patients with RBBB developed advanced CDs, predominantly complete or high-degree atrioventricular block (CHB/HAVB) (97%).
- The majority of CDs (98%) occurred within 3 days post-TAVR, with 85% being intraprocedural.
- Nearly half (47.3%) required PPMI, a significantly higher rate than in non-RBBB patients (11.0%).
- Complete conduction recovery was rare (2%). Patients with persistent intraprocedural CHB/HAVB had higher VPP at 1 month.
- A higher risk of PPMI was observed at 4-year follow-up in RBBB patients compared to non-RBBB patients (26% vs. 8%).
Conclusions:
- Advanced CDs post-TAVR in RBBB patients typically manifest early and show limited recovery.
- The high rate of PPMI in this group necessitates careful consideration for device implantation timing and hospitalization duration.
- Pre-existing RBBB is a significant predictor of long-term PPMI after TAVR.
Aims:
This study sought to determine the timing and evolution over time of advanced conduction disturbances (CDs) in patients with baseline right bundle branch block (RBBB) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Methods And Results:
One hundred and ten consecutive patients with pre-existing RBBB were included (out of 1341, 8.2%). All arrhythmias during the hospitalization period were recorded. Follow-up was performed at 30 days, 1 year, and yearly thereafter. Conduction recovery and ventricular pacing percentage (VPP) was evaluated at 30 days in those patients with permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI). Sixty-one (55.5%) patients suffered advanced CDs [97% complete or high-degree atrioventricular block (CHB/HAVB)], and the vast majority (98%) occurred within the first 3 days post-procedure (intraprocedural: 85%). Fifty-two (47.3%) patients had PPMI (vs. 11.0% in non-RBBB patients, P < 0.001). Ventricular pacing percentage at 1 month was higher in patients with persistent-intraprocedural CHB/HAVB compared to those with transient-intraprocedural or post-procedural CHB/HAVB [99 (interquartile range, IQR 97-100)% vs. 72 (IQR 30-99)%, P = 0.02]. Complete recovery (VPP < 1%) was observed in only one patient (2%) with CHB/HAVB. After hospital discharge, no symptomatic bradyarrhythmias or sudden death occurred within 30 days. Patients with pre-existing RBBB exhibited a higher risk of PPMI at 4-year follow-up (26% vs. 8% in non-RBBB patients, P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
In patients with pre-existing RBBB, the vast majority of advanced CDs occurred within the 3 days following TAVR, and most did not recover at 1-month, particularly those with intra-procedural persistent CHB/HAVB. These results should help to determine the hospitalization length and timing of PPMI in RBBB patients undergoing TAVR.
More Related Videos
06:04Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias