Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

06:39
Aerosol-assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition of Metal Oxide Structures: Zinc Oxide Rods
Published on: September 14, 2017
13.5K
Long-term calibration models to estimate ozone concentrations with a metal oxide sensor
Tofigh Sayahi1, Alicia Garff2, Timothy Quah3
1University of Utah, Department of Chemical Engineering, 3290 MEB, 50 S. Central Campus Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
|September 2, 2020
Summary
Low-cost metal oxide sensors can measure ozone (O3) but require calibration. An artificial neural network model improved ozone prediction accuracy, complementing regulatory air quality monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Sensor Technology
- Atmospheric Chemistry
Background:
- Ozone (O3) is a harmful air pollutant. Low-cost metal oxide (MO) sensors offer potential for enhanced ozone monitoring but face data quality challenges.
- The University of Utah's AirU network uses MO sensors, demonstrating good lab response to ozone despite intra-sensor variability.
- Regulatory ozone measurements often lack the spatiotemporal resolution needed for comprehensive air quality assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the field performance of low-cost MO sensors for ozone (O3) detection.
- To develop and compare calibration models (MLR and ANN) for predicting O3 concentrations using MO sensor data.
- To assess the generalizability of these calibration models for predicting ozone levels from similar sensors.
Main Methods:
- Eight AirU sensor packages were co-located with regulatory ozone monitors for one year.
- Multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were developed using sensor data and meteorological variables.
- Variable selection was performed using LASSO, MLR, and ANN to identify key predictors for ozone concentration.
Main Results:
- The ANN calibration model showed superior performance (R² = 0.767) compared to MLR (R² = 0.491) on a holdout set of MO sensors.
- Both models demonstrated moderate predictive power for ozone concentrations in the subsequent five months (ANN R² = 0.567, MLR R² = 0.427).
- Key predictors identified included MO sensor readings, temperature, and solar radiation.
Conclusions:
- Low-cost MO sensors, when calibrated with an ANN model, can effectively supplement reference methods for ozone monitoring.
- This approach enhances the understanding of ozone's spatial and temporal variations.
- The developed ANN model shows promise for improving the accuracy and applicability of low-cost sensor networks in air quality studies.

