Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
Published on: May 1, 2018
Fast Time Synchronization on Tens of Picoseconds Level Using Uncombined GNSS Carrier Phase of Zero/Short Baseline
Yinghao Zhao1, Letao Zhou1, Wei Feng1
1Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China.
Abstract:
Since the observation precision of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) carrier phase is on the order of millimeters, if the phase ambiguity is correctly solved, while calibrating the receiver inter-frequency bias, time synchronization on the order of tens of picoseconds is expected. In this contribution, a method that considers the prior constraints of the between-receiver inter-frequency bias (IFB) and its random variation characteristics is proposed for the estimation of the between-receiver clock difference, based on the uncombined GNSS carrier phase and pseudorange observations of the zero and short baselines. The proposed method can rapidly achieve the single-difference ambiguity resolution of the zero and short baselines, and then obtain the high-precision relative clock offset, by using only the carrier phase observations, along with the between-receiver IFBs being simultaneously determined. Our numerical tests, carried out using GNSS observations sampled every 30 s by a dedicatedly selected set of zero and short baselines, show that the method can fix the between-receiver single-difference ambiguity successfully within an average of fewer than 2 epochs (interval 30 s). Then, a clock difference between two receivers with millimeter precision is obtained, achieving time synchronization on tens of picoseconds level, and deriving a frequency stability of 5 × 10-14 for averaging times of 30,000 s. Furthermore, the proposed approach is compared with the precise point positioning (PPP) time transfer method. The results show that, for different types of receivers, the agreement between the two methods is between -6.7 ns and 0.2 ns.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Global Positioning System
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
Errors in Global Positioning System
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys
Field Application of Global Positioning System

