Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

1.2K
Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
1.2K
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

685
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
685
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

362
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
362
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

706
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
706
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

975
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
975
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers01:23

Primary and Secondary Reinforcers

717
In psychology, reinforcement is a key concept in behavior modification. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments involving rats in what is known as a Skinner box. The rats learned to press a lever to receive food, a primary reinforcer that fulfilled their innate need for nourishment.
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
717

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Latent subdimensions of anxiety and depression differentially influence exertion of effort in pursuit of reward versus avoidance of threat.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Model-based and model-free valuation signals in the human brain vary markedly in relation to individual differences in behavioral control.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

A habit and working memory model as an alternative account of human reward-based learning.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Model-based and model-free valuation signals in the human brain vary markedly in their relationship to individual differences in behavioral control.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Striatal dopamine can enhance both fast working memory, and slow reinforcement learning, while reducing implicit effort cost sensitivity.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Episodic memory contributions to working memory-supported reinforcement learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Operant Learning of Drosophila at the Torque Meter
17:31

Operant Learning of Drosophila at the Torque Meter

Published on: June 16, 2008

13.9K

Beyond dichotomies in reinforcement learning.

Anne G E Collins1, Jeffrey Cockburn2

  • 1Department of Psychology and the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. annecollins@berkeley.edu.

Nature Reviews. Neuroscience
|September 3, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Reinforcement learning (RL) research, crucial for psychology and neuroscience, risks oversimplification by mapping algorithms like model-based (MB) and model-free (MF) RL to cognitive processes. This study advocates for moving beyond such dichotomies to a more nuanced understanding of learning.

More Related Videos

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.6K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Operant Learning of Drosophila at the Torque Meter
17:31

Operant Learning of Drosophila at the Torque Meter

Published on: June 16, 2008

13.9K
An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.6K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Reinforcement learning (RL) integrates psychology, neuroscience, and machine learning, enabling multi-level analysis.
  • Sophisticated RL algorithms, including model-based (MB) and model-free (MF) systems, have been developed to explain human learning.
  • The dichotomous MB/MF framework, while beneficial, may oversimplify cognitive processes and learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the consequences of rigidly mapping RL algorithms to cognitive processes.
  • To argue for moving beyond simplistic dichotomies in RL research.
  • To propose a refocused research agenda for understanding learning and decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of current RL algorithms and their application to cognitive processes.
  • Critique of the overreliance on the model-based versus model-free (MB/MF) dichotomy.
  • Proposal for a more integrated and component-based approach to studying learning.

Main Results:

  • Overly confident mapping of RL algorithms to cognitive functions can distort research questions.
  • The MB/MF dichotomy may limit a comprehensive understanding of learning and decision-making.
  • Current research frameworks are capable of supporting more sophisticated and nuanced investigations.

Conclusions:

  • The field should transition from simplistic MB/MF dichotomies to a richer, component-based understanding of learning.
  • Refocusing research questions will yield deeper insights into the complexities of learning and decision-making.
  • Interdisciplinary collaboration in RL can drive paradigm shifts in understanding cognition.