Independent Reliability Analysis of a New Classification for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

Gaston Camino Willhuber1,2, Alfredo Guiroy2,3, Juan Zamorano2,4

  • 137533Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Global Spine Journal
|September 3, 2020
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study found the new Pola et al. classification for pyogenic spondylodiscitis has substantial interobserver and intraobserver agreement. Further research is needed to confirm its clinical utility.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Pyogenic spondylodiscitis poses significant risks, including deformity and mortality.
  • A novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification for spondylodiscitis has been proposed.
  • Reliability of new diagnostic classifications is crucial for clinical adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To independently assess the reliability of the new MRI-based classification for pyogenic spondylodiscitis.
  • Evaluate both interobserver and intraobserver agreement for the proposed classification system.

Main Methods:

  • A diagnostic study with level of evidence III.
  • 35 cases of pyogenic spondylodiscitis were reviewed by 8 independent observers.
  • Interobserver reliability was assessed using Fleiss statistics, and intraobserver reliability using Cohen statistics.

Main Results:

  • Substantial agreement was found for both interobserver (Fleiss κ = 0.67) and intraobserver (Cohen κ = 0.68) reliability for the main classification types.
  • Interobserver agreement for subtypes was also substantial (Fleiss κ = 0.60-0.61).
  • Intraobserver agreement for subtypes was substantial (Cohen κ = 0.63).

Conclusions:

  • The new classification system for pyogenic spondylodiscitis demonstrates substantial interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
  • Additional studies are recommended to validate the clinical usefulness of this classification.