Analysis of KRAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA and colorectal cancer tissue

Yankui Liu1, Longhai Li2, Yu Tian2

  • 1Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.

Insights

Detecting KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is crucial for anti-EGFR therapy. Plasma-based KRAS testing using IAMB technology offers a viable alternative to tissue analysis, especially when combined.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Diagnostics
  • Genetics

Background:

  • KRAS mutation status is critical for guiding anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC).
  • Detecting KRAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) presents challenges.
  • Accurate KRAS mutation detection is essential for personalized CRC treatment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the efficacy of tissue and plasma assays for KRAS mutation detection in CRC patients.
  • To evaluate the performance of the Integration of Amplification Refractory Mutation System Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), melting curves, and wild type DNA blocking (IAMB) technology.
  • To determine the optimal strategy for KRAS mutation detection by analyzing parallel versus series approaches of tissue and plasma testing.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated KRAS status in 407 CRC patients using IAMB technology on both tissue and plasma samples.
  • Re-evaluated discordant cases using Sanger sequencing of tissue samples.
  • Analyzed general patient characteristics and tumor biomarkers (CEA, CA19-9, CA125).

Main Results:

  • Prevalence of KRAS mutations was 40.8% in plasma and 49.1% in tissue.
  • Overall agreement between plasma and tissue assays was 82.3%, with 90.8% negative percent agreement.
  • Plasma assay sensitivity for KRAS mutations increased with older patient age and higher TNM stage.
  • Parallel analysis of tissue and plasma detected KRAS mutations in 54.1% of patients, compared to 36.4% with series analysis.
  • Plasma-based KRAS detection using IAMB technology demonstrated high concordance with tissue-based testing.

Conclusions:

  • Plasma-based KRAS detection using IAMB technology is a reliable alternative to tissue-based testing for CRC patients.
  • Combined analysis of tissue and plasma samples significantly improves the detection rate of KRAS mutations.
  • This approach enhances the identification of patients eligible for anti-EGFR therapy, optimizing treatment decisions.