Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring local and regional drivers of microbial biodiversity across freshwater ponds.

FEMS microbiology ecology·2026
Same author

Amphibians After Disease-Induced Declines: Genetic Insights Into Population Recoveries.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same author

Field Survey of Freshwater Invertebrates Reveals That Several Groups Are Potential Carriers of the Fungal Pathogen <i>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis</i>.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Emergence from torpor rapidly elevates suppressed blood immune parameters in a bat species hibernating in a moderate climate.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same author

Selection-driven color variation in the aposematic strawberry poison frog, Oophaga pumilio.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Sexual selection's role in the persistence of polymorphism in an aposematic signal.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Use of a Filter Cartridge for Filtration of Water Samples and Extraction of Environmental DNA
08:04

Use of a Filter Cartridge for Filtration of Water Samples and Extraction of Environmental DNA

Published on: November 25, 2016

27.9K

Evaluating environmental DNA as a tool for detecting an amphibian pathogen using an optimized extraction method.

Laura A Brannelly1,2, Daniel P Wetzel3, Michel E B Ohmer3

  • 1Department of Biological Science, Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. laura.brannelly@unimelb.edu.au.

Oecologia
|September 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection effectively identifies amphibian pathogens. The Qiagen PowerSoil extraction method offers superior detection in water samples, aiding early warning systems for conservation efforts.

Keywords:
AmphibianChytridiomycosisEDNAEnvironmental detectionExtraction

More Related Videos

Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications
08:54

Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications

Published on: November 5, 2020

15.7K
Author Spotlight: Understanding and Detecting Environmental Antimicrobial Resistance by Combining Culture-Based Techniques and Genomics
06:54

Author Spotlight: Understanding and Detecting Environmental Antimicrobial Resistance by Combining Culture-Based Techniques and Genomics

Published on: July 19, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Use of a Filter Cartridge for Filtration of Water Samples and Extraction of Environmental DNA
08:04

Use of a Filter Cartridge for Filtration of Water Samples and Extraction of Environmental DNA

Published on: November 25, 2016

27.9K
Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications
08:54

Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications

Published on: November 5, 2020

15.7K
Author Spotlight: Understanding and Detecting Environmental Antimicrobial Resistance by Combining Culture-Based Techniques and Genomics
06:54

Author Spotlight: Understanding and Detecting Environmental Antimicrobial Resistance by Combining Culture-Based Techniques and Genomics

Published on: July 19, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Amphibian disease ecology
  • Environmental molecular diagnostics

Background:

  • Batrachochytrium pathogens are a major driver of amphibian population declines globally.
  • Environmental DNA (eDNA) offers a non-invasive method for pathogen detection.
  • A lack of comparative studies on eDNA extraction methods for Batrachochytrium in environmental samples.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically compare eDNA extraction methods for detecting Batrachochytrium in environmental samples.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of water filter eDNA for pathogen detection and quantification.
  • To inform best practices for using eDNA in amphibian conservation and disease monitoring.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of multiple eDNA extraction kits (Qiagen PowerSoil, QIAamp, DNeasy+Qiashredder) using spiked water samples.
  • Testing the optimal method on field-collected water, sediment, and amphibian skin swab samples.
  • Analysis of detection rates and pathogen loads in relation to sample type, volume, and seasonality.

Main Results:

  • The Qiagen PowerSoil kit demonstrated the highest sensitivity and detection probability for Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis DNA in water.
  • eDNA from water filters was comparable to skin swabs for pathogen presence detection.
  • Pathogen load quantification was limited in water samples, with lower detection rates in sediments.
  • Detection probability increased with larger water volumes filtered.

Conclusions:

  • Water filter eDNA is a valuable tool for detecting amphibian pathogen presence at the habitat scale.
  • The PowerSoil extraction method enhances eDNA detection sensitivity for Batrachochytrium.
  • eDNA serves as an effective early warning system, guiding targeted amphibian sampling efforts.