Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
β-lactam dosing strategies: Think before you push.
Jiajun Liu1, Nathaniel J Rhodes1, Jason A Roberts2
1Midwestern University Chicago College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, USA; Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, USA; Midwestern University Chicago College of Pharmacy Pharmacometrics Center of Excellence, Downers Grove, USA.
Intravenous push (IVP) cefepime may reduce antibiotic exposure and efficacy compared to intermittent infusion, especially at higher MICs. Caution is advised when using IVP cefepime to avoid potential clinical consequences.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacy
Background:
- Cefepime, a broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic, is crucial for treating serious infections.
- Intravenous push (IVP) administration of cefepime is being explored to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
- Potential impacts of IVP cefepime on antibiotic exposure and pharmacodynamic efficacy require thorough evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the pharmacodynamic (PD) effect of cefepime administered via IVP versus 30-minute intermittent infusion.
- To evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) for cefepime regimens across various renal functions and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).
Main Methods:
- Population pharmacokinetic modeling of cefepime was employed.
- Simulations were conducted for IVP and 30-minute intermittent infusion regimens.
- The primary endpoint was the absolute difference in PTA, defined as free drug concentrations exceeding MIC for ≥70% of the dosing interval.
Main Results:
- IVP cefepime demonstrated lower PTA compared to intermittent infusion, particularly at elevated MICs (1-4 mg/L and ≥8 mg/L).
- Absolute PTA differences ranged up to 5.4% at MICs of 1-4 mg/L.
- Higher renal function was associated with lower PTAs across simulated regimens.
Conclusions:
- Simulated cefepime IVP resulted in reduced PTA at higher MICs compared to intermittent infusion.
- Clinicians should exercise caution with IVP cefepime due to potential unintended clinical consequences.
- Further evaluation is needed to optimize cefepime dosing strategies.
More Related Videos
11:15Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
Published on: July 24, 2021
09:17A Robust Pneumonia Model in Immunocompetent Rodents to Evaluate Antibacterial Efficacy against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii
Published on: January 2, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Dosage Interval and Administration Route: Determination Methods
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children