Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: On-Site Biochar Production for Woody Debris Incineration in Forestry
Published on: January 5, 2024
Global warming implications from increased forest biomass utilization for bioenergy in a supply-constrained context
Koldo Saez de Bikuña1, Rita Garcia1, Ana Cláudia Dias2
1ADAI, LAETA, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Coimbra. Rua Luís Reis Santos, 3030-788, Coimbra, Portugal.
Sustainable forest management and plantation expansion offer long-term global warming mitigation for bioenergy, while full residue harvest and biomass import provide faster but less effective solutions with potential risks.
Area of Science:
- Forestry science
- Climate change mitigation
- Bioenergy production
Background:
- Increasing demand for biomass for bioenergy necessitates analysis of forest management impacts.
- Maritime pine forest plantations in Portugal are a key case study for biomass sourcing.
- Global warming implications of different forest management strategies require urgent assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze forest management strategies for bioenergy biomass supply.
- To assess the global warming implications of these strategies in Portugal.
- To inform national forest and energy policies for environmental benefits.
Main Methods:
- Parametric stand-level C-flux model adapted to Portuguese conditions.
- Dynamic CO2 inventory and landscape-level extension coupled with a climate model.
- Calculation of time-adjusted absolute global warming potential (AGWP) for various scenarios.
Main Results:
- Sustainable and proactive management (SMART) and expansion (EXP) show long-term global warming mitigation benefits (GWPbio < 0).
- Full residue harvest (FULL) and biomass import (IMP) offer fast supply but limited to null AGWP reduction (0 < GWPbio < 1) with associated risks.
- SMART and EXP strategies have a slow supply response, while FULL and IMP have a fast response.
Conclusions:
- SMART and EXP strategies are effective for long-term climate mitigation in supply-constrained regions.
- FULL and IMP strategies provide short-term biomass supply but require careful risk management and policy consideration.
- National policies must be revised to balance short-term bioenergy needs with long-term environmental sustainability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Global Climate Change
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms
Threats to Biodiversity
The Carbon Cycle
Trophic Efficiency
What is Conservation Biology?

