Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Evaluation of a shared decision-making intervention for pediatric patients with asthma in the emergency department
Kelly Reeves1, Katherine O'Hare1, Lindsay Shade1
1Department of Family Medicine Research, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400B Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA.
Insights
Implementing a web-based shared decision-making (SDM) tool in emergency departments (EDs) can improve asthma care. This study evaluates its effectiveness and identifies best practices for integrating SDM into acute care settings.
Area of Science:
- Implementation Science
- Health Informatics
- Pediatric Asthma Management
Background:
- Asthma exacerbations lead to high emergency department (ED) utilization and outcome disparities, particularly among at-risk populations.
- Shared decision-making (SDM) improves patient outcomes but faces implementation barriers like time constraints.
- Health IT solutions offer potential for SDM adoption, yet best practices remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and evaluate a web-based pediatric SDM tool in two healthcare system EDs.
- To identify barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
- To assess patient-centered outcomes and document best practices for ED implementation.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing the CFIR model to guide implementation evaluation.
- Administering surveys to clinical teams and patients at multiple time points (baseline, 3, 6, 12 months).
- Conducting focus groups/interviews for iterative feedback and tracking patient-centered outcomes like primary care and ED utilization.
Main Results:
- Ongoing evaluation of implementation barriers and facilitators to inform real-time process adjustments.
- Tracking of patient-centered outcomes including primary care, ED, and inpatient utilization.
- Documentation of best practices for SDM tool integration in ED settings.
Conclusions:
- Further research is essential to establish best practices for SDM integration in high-need settings like EDs.
- This knowledge can drive improved asthma care outcomes and inform policy for wider SDM adoption.
- Successful implementation of SDM tools can enhance acute care delivery and patient engagement.
Background:
Asthma is a difficult-to-manage chronic disease marked with associated outcome disparities including an increase rate of emergency department (ED) visits for uncontrolled asthma among patients who are most at-risk. Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which the patient and provider jointly make a healthcare choice. SDM improves patient outcomes; however, implementation barriers of time constraints and staff availability are limitations. The use of health IT solutions may increase the adoption of SDM, but best practices for implementation are not well understood. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a flexible comprehensive model used to identify barriers and facilitators influencing implementation. The goal of this study is to implement an innovative web-based pediatric SDM tool in the real-world setting of two large healthcare system EDs through the following aims: (1) convene a patient, research, and ED stakeholder advisory board to oversee review of protocol and study materials prior to implementation, (2) implement the SDM intervention where providers and staff will be trained to incorporate use of this SDM intervention, (3) conduct on-going evaluation of barriers, facilitators, and implementation outcomes to tailor implementation in the EDs, (4) evaluate patient-centered outcomes of primary care utilization and changes in ED visits and hospitalizations before and after the SDM intervention, and (5) understand and document best practices for ED implementation.
Methods:
The CFIR model will guide the implementation evaluation. Researchers will administer surveys to the clinical team and patients at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months to inform implementation design, determine barriers and facilitators, and resource-needs to allow for real-time process adjustments within the EDs. Focus group or key-informant interviews and analysis will provide additional feedback to the stakeholder team to iterate the implementation process. Researchers will track patient-centered outcomes including increased primary care, ED, and inpatient utilization over the duration of the study.
Discussion:
To advance asthma care and the field of implementation science, further research is needed to assess best practices for incorporating SDM into high-need healthcare settings such as the ED. This knowledge will facilitate improved outcomes and appropriate policy changes towards further use of SDM interventions in local and national acute care settings.
Related Concept Videos
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Asthma-IV: Nursing Management
First, in...
Asthma-I: Introduction
Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma

