Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Visit-to-visit HbA1c variability is associated with in-stent restenosis in patients with type 2 diabetes after
Chen Die Yang1, Ying Shen1, Lin Lu1,2
1Department of Cardiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao-Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Road II, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Insights
Visit-to-visit glycemic variability, measured by HbA1c coefficient of variation, independently predicts in-stent restenosis in type 2 diabetes patients post-stent implantation. Higher variability indicates increased risk, improving risk stratification for these patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
- Diabetes Mellitus Research
Background:
- Type 2 diabetes patients face elevated risks of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after coronary stent procedures.
- Glycemic control, specifically HbA1c variability, is increasingly recognized as a critical factor in cardiovascular outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the predictive value of visit-to-visit HbA1c variability for ISR in type 2 diabetes patients.
- To determine if HbA1c variability offers incremental predictive power beyond mean HbA1c levels for ISR.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 420 type 2 diabetes patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention were followed for approximately 12 months.
- Visit-to-visit HbA1c variability was assessed using coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD), and variability independent of the mean (VIM).
- Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were employed to analyze the association between HbA1c variability and ISR incidence.
Main Results:
- The overall incidence of ISR was 8.6%, significantly higher in patients with greater HbA1c CV (P=0.001).
- Higher HbA1c variability, particularly CV, was linked to increased diameter stenosis and was more pronounced in patients with baseline HbA1c ≤ 7%.
- HbA1c variability (CV) independently predicted ISR (HR: 3.00 [95% CI 1.14-7.92] for highest vs. lowest tertile) and improved risk stratification accuracy.
Conclusions:
- Visit-to-visit HbA1c variability is an independent predictor of ISR in type 2 diabetes patients following coronary stent implantation.
- Assessing HbA1c variability provides valuable prognostic information for managing ISR risk in diabetic patients.
- These findings highlight the importance of monitoring glycemic fluctuations, not just average levels, for cardiovascular event prevention.
Background:
Patients with type 2 diabetes are under substantially higher risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after coronary stent implantation. We sought to investigate whether visit-to-visit HbA1c variability is a potential predictor of ISR in diabetic patients after stent implantation.
Methods:
We consecutively enrolled type 2 diabetic patients who underwent successful elective percutaneous coronary intervention and performed follow-up coronary angiography after around 12 months. The incidence of ISR and its relationship with visit-to-visit HbA1c variability, expressed as coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD) and variability independent of the mean (VIM), were studied. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to analyze the predictive value of HbA1c variability for ISR.
Results:
From September 2014 to July 2018 in Ruijin Hospital, a total of 420 diabetic patients (688 lesions) after stent implantation were included in the final analysis. During a mean follow-up of 12.8 ± 1.3 months, the incidence of ISR was 8.6%, which was significantly increased in patients with higher CV of HbA1c (P = 0.001). The mean diameter stenosis (DS), net luminal loss and net luminal gain were 22.9 ± 16.8%, 0.42 ± 0.88 mm and 1.66 ± 0.83 mm, respectively. Greater DS was observed in subjects with higher tertiles of CV of HbA1c (P < 0.001), and this trend was more prominent in patients with optimal glycemic control (HbA1c ≤ 7%) in the baseline. In multivariate analysis, HbA1c variability was independently associated with incidence of ISR after adjustment for traditional risk factors and mean HbA1c (HR: 3.00 [95% CI 1.14-7.92] for highest vs. lowest tertile). Inclusion of CV of HbA1c led to a better risk stratification accuracy. Assessing HbA1c variability by SD or VIM yielded similar findings.
Conclusions:
This study suggests that visit-to-visit HbA1c variability is an independent predictor of incidence of ISR in patients with type 2 diabetes after stent implantation. Trial registration NCT02089360: NCT.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational

