Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Trends of repeat revascularization choice in patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery
Mohamed O Mohamed1,2, Ahmad Shoaib1,2, Bill Gogas3
1Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Insights
The rate of repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) doubled in the U.S. from 2004-2015. Redo CABG patients faced worse outcomes, including higher mortality and complications, compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common treatment for coronary artery disease.
- Repeat revascularization strategies are increasingly utilized in patients with prior CABG.
- Understanding trends and outcomes of repeat revascularization is crucial for patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the trends in repeat revascularization strategies (PCI and CABG) in patients with a history of CABG.
- To identify predictors for undergoing repeat revascularization.
- To analyze in-hospital outcomes associated with different revascularization strategies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database (2004-2015).
- Inclusion of patients hospitalized for revascularization with a history of CABG.
- Use of regression analyses to determine predictors and outcomes.
Main Results:
- The rate of redo CABG doubled from 5.3% to 10.3% between 2004 and 2015.
- Redo CABG patients were more comorbid and experienced significantly worse outcomes: major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (OR 5.36), mortality (OR 2.84), bleeding (OR 5.97), and stroke (OR 2.15).
- Thoracic complications were notably high (8%) in redo CABG patients, particularly females. Male sex, age <80, and absence of diabetes/renal failure favored redo CABG.
Conclusions:
- Reoperation rates for patients with prior CABG have doubled in the US over 12 years.
- Patients undergoing redo CABG represent a more complex population with poorer clinical outcomes compared to those receiving PCI.
- These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and risk stratification for repeat revascularization procedures.
Objective:
To examine rates and predictors repeat revascularization strategies (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] and coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) in patients with prior CABG.
Methods:
Using the National Inpatient Sample, patients with a history of CABG hospitalized for revascularization by PCI or CABG from January 2004 to September 2015 were included. Regression analyses were performed to examine predictors of receipt of either revascularization strategy as well as in-hospital outcomes.
Results:
The rate of redo CABG doubled between 2004 (5.3%) and 2015 (10.3%). Patients who underwent redo CABG were more comorbid and experienced significantly worse major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (odds ratio [OR]: 5.36 95% CI 5.11-5.61), mortality (OR 2.84 95% CI 2.60,-3.11), bleeding (OR 5.97 95% CI 5.44-6.55) and stroke (OR 2.15 95% CI 1.92-2.41), but there was no difference in cardiac complications between groups. Thoracic complications were high in patients undergoing redo CABG (8%), especially in females. Factors favoring receipt of redo CABG compared to PCI included male sex, age < 80 years, and absence of diabetes and renal failure.
Conclusion:
Reoperation in patients with prior CABG has doubled in the United States over a 12-year period. Patients undergoing redo CABG are more complex and associated with worse clinical outcomes than those receiving PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

