Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking
Published on: February 12, 2011
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Hypertension Patients: A Myocardial MR Strain Study
Jian He1, Arlene Sirajuddin2, Shuang Li1
1Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Background:
Despite current recommendations for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), few studies have demonstrated the ability of MRI to identify subtle functional differences between HFpEF with essential hypertension (HFpEF-HTN) patients and hypertension patients (HTN).
Purpose:
This study aimed to detect and evaluate HFpEF in patients with HTN using feature-tracking (FT) and to ascertain optimal strain cutoffs for the diagnosis of HFpEF-HTN.
Study Type:
Retrospective study.
Population:
Three groups (84 with HFpEF-HTN; 72 with HTN; and 70 healthy controls).
Field Strength:
1.5T, steady-state free precession (SSFP), and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) sequences.
Assessment:
All patients underwent laboratory testing and imaging protocols (echocardiography and MRI). FT-derived left ventricular (LV) strain and strain rate (SR) were measured and compared among the three groups with adjustment for confounding factors.
Statistical Tests:
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test, independent-sample t-tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson's correlation coefficient, area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), and logistic regression.
Results:
Compared to 72 HTN patients and 70 healthy controls, HFpEF-HTN patients (84 patients) demonstrated significantly impaired LV strains (except for global peak systolic radial strain, GRS, P < 0.05 for all). Only LV global peak systolic longitudinal strain (GLS) was significantly impaired in HTN patients vs. controls (P < 0.05). The global peak systolic circumferential SR (sGCSR) showed the highest diagnostic value for the differentiation of HFpEF-HTN patients from HTN patients (AUC, 0.731; cutoff value, -1.11/s; sensitivity, 56.0%; specificity, 84.7%). Only global peak early diastolic longitudinal SR (eGLSR) remained independently associated with a diagnosis of HFpEF-HTN in multilogistic analysis. The major strain parameters significantly correlated with LV ejection fraction, end-systolic volume index, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (P < 0.05 for all) and also demonstrated differences between NYHA functional class.
Data Conclusion:
HFpEF-HTN patients suffer from both systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction. FT-derived strain parameters have potential value for the diagnosis and risk stratification of HFpEF-HTN patients. Level of Evidence 3. Technical Efficacy Stage 2.
More Related Videos
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
11:13Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure I: Introduction