Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
What Is the Dislocation and Revision Rate of Dual-mobility Cups Used in Complex Revision THAs?
Niklas Unter Ecker1,2,3, Hakan Kocaoğlu1,2,3, Akos Zahar1,2,3
1N. U. Ecker, H. Kocaoğlu, C. Haasper, T. Gehrke, M. Citak, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Insights
Dual-mobility cups in complex revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) showed higher dislocation rates than anticipated. Careful consideration is advised for cases with significant bone or soft-tissue loss.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Arthroplasty
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Dual-mobility cups (DMCs) are recognized for reducing dislocation risk in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
- Their efficacy in complex revision THA, particularly with extensive bone/soft-tissue loss or multiple prior surgeries, remains less studied.
- This study evaluates DMCs in challenging revision THA scenarios.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the survival rate free from revision for dislocation of DMCs in complex revision THA.
- To assess the overall survival rate free from any dislocation in these patients.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 327 patients undergoing complex revision THA with DMCs between 2009-2013 was analyzed.
- Complex revision was defined by criteria including significant bone loss, soft-tissue involvement, or multiple prior procedures.
- Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed on 216 patients with a median follow-up of 69 months.
Main Results:
- Dislocation-free survival was 96% at 5 years and 82% at 9 years.
- Survival free from revision for dislocation was 99% at 5 years and 85% at 9 years.
- The overall dislocation rate was 11% at the final follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Dual-mobility cups in this complex revision THA cohort exhibited higher dislocation and revision rates than previously reported.
- While DMCs remain a primary option for instability, cautious use is recommended in cases of severe bone loss or soft-tissue compromise.
- Further research is needed to optimize outcomes in these challenging patient populations.
Background:
Dual-mobility cups have been shown to reduce the dislocation risk after THA. Although dual-mobility cups can be a useful strategy to mitigate against recurrent dislocation after revision surgery, few clinical studies have focused on the results of complex revision THAs with extensive bone and soft-tissue loss or in patients who have undergone more than one previous surgical procedure.
Questions/Purposes:
(1) What is the survival free from revision for dislocation of dual-mobility cups used in complex revision THAs? (2) What is the survival free from any dislocation?
Methods:
Between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013, 327 patients underwent a complex revision THA that included an acetabular revision, defined as preexisting massive bone loss in the acetabulum (at least Paprosky Type 2B) and/or proximal femur (at least Paprosky Type 3), substantial gluteal soft-tissue involvement, at least two previous surgical procedures or a one-stage septic revision, or history of dislocation. All 327 complex revision patients received a dual-mobility cup. Of those, 34% (111) were lost to follow-up before 5 years and were not known to have reached a study endpoint (revision for dislocation, and any dislocation) before then, leaving 216 patients for analysis. For patients with bilateral hip surgeries only the first operated hip was included for analysis. The median (range) follow-up duration was 69 months (60 to 110). The primary endpoint was dislocation or re-revision for dislocation. Fifty-six percent (120 of 216) of the patients were women and 44% (96 of 216) were men. The mean age of the patients was 69 ± 9 years. The patients underwent a median of four surgical procedures (1 to 4) before the index procedure (the revision evaluated in this study). A survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method; any dislocation or revision for dislocation was determined as the endpoint.
Results:
The dislocation-free survival rates were 96% (95% confidence interval 92 to 98) at 5 years and 82% (95% CI 72 to 89) at 9 years. The overall dislocation rate was 11% (24 of 216 patients) at the final follow-up interval. Survival free of revision for dislocation was 99% (95% CI 96 to 100) at 5 years and 85% (95% CI 75 to 92) at 9 years.
Conclusions:
Dual-mobility cups used in complex revision THA in this series had a higher rate of dislocation and revision than expected, based on earlier studies of dislocations of these components. Although we believe dual-mobility cups are still the first choice of implant if the patient has instability, these cups should be used cautiously if severe bone loss or soft-tissue involvement is present.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, therapeutic study.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
05:30Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
Published on: February 14, 2025