Localization of deep brain activity with scalp and subdural EEG
Mansoureh Fahimi Hnazaee1, Benjamin Wittevrongel1, Elvira Khachatryan1
1Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Neuroimage
|September 8, 2020
Summary
Scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocorticography (ECoG) show comparable accuracy in locating deep brain activity sources. This study compared simultaneous EEG, ECoG, and depth electrode recordings, finding no significant difference in deep source localization accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Signal Processing
Background:
- Deep and subcortical brain regions are crucial for cognitive functions.
- Comparing the capabilities of electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocorticography (ECoG) for deep brain source localization remains an open question.
- Existing research highlights EEG's potential for deep source detection, while ECoG offers superior spatial resolution but limited coverage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare the accuracy of electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocorticography (ECoG) in localizing deep brain activity sources.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of independent component analysis (ICA) for source localization using multimodal EEG and ECoG data.
- To assess the clinical significance of differences in deep source localization accuracy between EEG and ECoG.
Main Methods:
- Recorded simultaneous scalp EEG, subdural ECoG, and depth EEG (hippocampus/insula) from 4 epilepsy patients during quiet wakefulness.
- Applied independent component analysis (ICA) to isolate neural sources in theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands.
- Utilized dipole modeling to determine source locations of correlating components and compared their proximity to depth electrodes.
Main Results:
- Components from both subdural ECoG and scalp EEG showed significant correlations with depth electrode contacts.
- Dipole modeling revealed that sources localized using subdural electrodes were approximately 70% closer to depth electrodes (~2cm improvement) compared to scalp EEG.
- Despite the proximity advantage of ECoG, scalp EEG demonstrated comparable deep source localization accuracy to ECoG, challenging the notion of a considerable practical difference.
Conclusions:
- Scalp EEG offers a deep source localization accuracy comparable to ECoG, particularly when considering the practical limitations and proximity of implanted ECoG electrodes.
- The study provides novel multimodal data and experimental evidence comparing invasive and non-invasive brain activity measurements for deep cortical structure localization.
- The findings suggest that scalp EEG, despite its lower spatial resolution, can be a viable tool for investigating deep brain activity, potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures in some clinical contexts.


