Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

U.S. and Swedish primary care physicians' views on promoting healthy lifestyles: a qualitative study.

BMC primary care·2026
Same author

Protocol for Afterschool Rx 2.0: A pilot randomized crossover trial to determine the feasibility of prescriptions to afterschool care for children with cardiovascular risk factors.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Real-time surveillance system for patient deterioration: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Using a cross-sectoral partnership to improve colorectal cancer screening and follow-up among African Americans in the United States: A protocol and preliminary results.

Preventive medicine reports·2026
Same author

Earlier ICU Transfer after CONCERN Early Warning System Score Escalation Reduced Sepsis-related Mortality: Results from a Multi-site Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same author

Mechanisms of Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities-2.0 Effects on Weight: A Mediation Analysis.

Journal of nutrition education and behavior·2026
Same journal

Governance absorption of volume-based procurement: study of dual-track implementation in a public hospital.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same journal

Quality and reliability of cardiac rehabilitation-related short Chinese videos on Douyin and Bilibili: a cross-sectional content analysis.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same journal

The impact of emotional labor on emotional exhaustion of social workers: a test of the mediating effect of perceived job demands.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same journal

Clinical nurses as digital guardians: unlocking the key determinants of digital resilience in the AI era.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same journal

Best evidence summary of digital health interventions for self-management in patients with coronary artery disease.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same journal

Global prevalence and biopsychosocial correlates of psychological distress among people living with HIV: an updated theory-informed meta-analysis.

Frontiers in public health·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.0K

Evaluating a Two-Level vs. Three-Level Fall Risk Screening Algorithm for Predicting Falls Among Older Adults.

Thelma J Mielenz1, Sneha Kannoth1, Haomiao Jia2

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Frontiers in Public Health
|September 9, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Quick-STEADI algorithm effectively identifies fall risk in older adults. Both three-level and two-level versions showed similar predictive ability, with the three-level approach indicating lower fall likelihood for low/moderate risk groups.

Keywords:
falls preventionfalls riskfalls screeninginjuryinjury preventionolder adults

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
05:26

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.5K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.0K
Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
05:26

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.5K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Gerontology
  • Public Health
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Falls are a leading cause of preventable injury in older adults.
  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) algorithm for fall risk screening.
  • This study adapted STEADI into a "Quick-STEADI" algorithm for clinical use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive abilities of three-level and two-level Quick-STEADI fall risk screening algorithms.
  • To assess the qualitative implementation and feasibility of the Quick-STEADI algorithm in clinical settings.
  • To evaluate the algorithm's effectiveness in predicting subsequent daily falls in older adults.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective cohort study of 200 adults aged 65+ was conducted over 6 months.
  • Generalized linear mixed models and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) were used to analyze fall prediction.
  • Qualitative data were collected from 8 participants and 3 screeners to evaluate the screening experience and implementation.

Main Results:

  • The three-level Quick-STEADI algorithm showed that low and moderate fall risk predicted a reduced likelihood of daily falls compared to high risk (p=0.04).
  • The two-level Quick-STEADI algorithm did not significantly associate 'not at-risk' individuals with reduced daily falls (p=0.13).
  • Both algorithms demonstrated similar predictive ability for daily falls (AUC: 0.653 for three-level, 0.657 for two-level), and were found to be efficient and viable by users.

Conclusions:

  • The Quick-STEADI algorithm is a suitable and feasible alternative for fall risk screening in clinical settings.
  • Qualitative feedback supports its integration into existing healthcare workflows.
  • Future research should focus on validating and implementing Quick-STEADI in community health settings to streamline fall prevention efforts.