Management of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Comparative Study of Open and Minimally Invasive...

Objectives The ideal treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures continues to be a subject of debate. The aim of the study was to compare the radiological outcome, cumulative radiation exposure, surgical time, time to surgery, wound healing times and cost involved in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for calcaneal fractures. Methods This was a retrospective study of 39 calcaneum operated in our unit during 2012 to 2019, of which 20 had undergone ORIF and 19 had been operated upon following MIS. Results A total of 39 calcanea (37 patients) were operated, of which 20 had open procedure and 19 had MIS procedure, including one bilateral surgery in each group. Mean age of the patients in the MIS group was 42.18 years (range: 15-68 years) and that of the patients in the open group was 43 years (range: 21-75 years). Of the fractures, 53.84% (n = 21) was Sanders type III, 28.20% (n = 11) was type II and 17.94% (n = 7) was type IV. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean correction of Bohler's angle and Gissane's angle between the groups. The mean cost for implant used for each open procedure was £882.79, and the implant cost for each MIS procedure was £142.89. Mean utilisation of cumulative X-ray dose was significantly higher in MIS (0.764 mGy) in comparison to open surgery (0.392 mGy). The average surgical time for MIS was 64.9 minutes and that of open surgery was 106.3 minutes. Average waiting time for MIS was 6.6 days and that for ORIF was 9.8 days. Wound healing was quicker (average 13.4 days) in MIS than ORIF (average 17.2 days). All these differences were statistically significant. Conclusions Minimally invasive calcaneal fracture surgery is quicker and cheaper and can be performed earlier. It is associated with early wound healing, although it requires higher cumulative radiation dose.