Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Typical Model Studies01:30

Typical Model Studies

540
Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
540
Viscosity of Fluid01:19

Viscosity of Fluid

984
Viscosity measures the resistance a fluid offers to flow and deformation. It results from internal friction between layers of fluid moving relative to one another. Dynamic viscosity, denoted by the Greek letter mu (μ), quantifies the force needed to move one fluid layer over another. For Newtonian fluids like water and air, the relationship between the shearing stress and the rate of shearing strain is linear, meaning their viscosity remains constant regardless of the applied stress.
984
Newtonian Fluid: Problem Solving01:18

Newtonian Fluid: Problem Solving

727
Newtonian fluids exhibit a constant viscosity, meaning their shear stress and shear strain rate are directly proportional. This property ensures a predictable and stable response to applied forces, maintaining a linear relationship between force and flow. Examples include water, air, and light oils, consistently demonstrating this proportional behavior regardless of external conditions.
A velocity gradient forms within the fluid when a Newtonian fluid is placed between two parallel plates, with...
727
Viscosity01:17

Viscosity

6.9K
When water is poured into a glass, it falls freely and quickly, whereas if honey or maple syrup is poured over a pancake, it flows slowly and sticks to the surface of the container. This difference in the flow of different kinds of liquids arises due to the fluid friction between the liquid layers and the liquid and the surrounding material. This property of fluids is called fluid viscosity. In this example, water has a lower viscosity than honey and maple syrup.
The SI unit of viscosity is...
6.9K
Modeling and Similitude01:12

Modeling and Similitude

501
Scaled modeling is a fundamental technique in engineering, enabling the study of large and complex systems by creating smaller, manageable replicas that recreate critical characteristics of the original. In hydrology and civil infrastructure, for example, scaled models of dams help analyze water flow, turbulence, and pressure. This method allows for accurate predictions of real-world behavior within a controlled environment, significantly reducing the cost and time involved in full-scale...
501
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

413
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
413

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hybrid attention based deep learning for forecasting boundary layer ozone using satellite derived profiles.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2025
Same author

Deep learning for electroencephalography emotion recognition.

AIMS public health·2025
Same author

A two-stage deep learning-based hybrid model for daily wind speed forecasting.

Heliyon·2025
Same author

Personalized food consumption detection with deep learning and Inertial Measurement Unit sensor.

Computers in biology and medicine·2024
Same author

Super-strong and high-performance electrical film heater derived from silver nanowire/aligned bacterial cellulose film.

Bioresources and bioprocessing·2024
Same author

The Reporting Quality of Machine Learning Studies on Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review.

Journal of medical Internet research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique
10:12

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique

Published on: June 12, 2015

9.4K

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Nanofluids Viscosity Assessment.

Mohammadhadi Shateri1, Zeinab Sobhanigavgani1, Azin Alinasab1

  • 1Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2K6, Canada.

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)
|September 10, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Predicting nanofluid viscosity is crucial but challenging. This study introduces advanced machine learning models that significantly improve viscosity prediction accuracy compared to existing methods, offering a more cost-effective solution.

Keywords:
artificial intelligenceartificial neural networkbig datacomputational fluid dynamicscomputational mechanicsdata sciencedeep learningensemble modelsexperimental datamachine learningmaterial designnanonanofluidnanofluid viscositynanomaterials

More Related Videos

Meso-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry Studies of Neurovascular Flows In Vitro
08:00

Meso-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry Studies of Neurovascular Flows In Vitro

Published on: December 3, 2018

8.7K
An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids
11:03

An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids

Published on: December 4, 2017

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique
10:12

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique

Published on: June 12, 2015

9.4K
Meso-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry Studies of Neurovascular Flows In Vitro
08:00

Meso-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry Studies of Neurovascular Flows In Vitro

Published on: December 3, 2018

8.7K
An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids
11:03

An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids

Published on: December 4, 2017

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Computational Science

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of nanofluid viscosity is essential for their application.
  • Experimental viscosity measurements are costly and time-consuming.
  • Existing theoretical and empirical models often yield inaccurate results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate novel machine learning models for predicting nanofluid viscosity.
  • To compare the performance of these models against existing methods, including the Committee Machine Intelligent System (CMIS).
  • To assess the physical validity of the proposed models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a dataset of 3144 experimental relative viscosity data points for 42 nanofluid systems.
  • Developed eight machine learning models: Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) with Nadam/Adamax optimizers, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Extra Tree (ET).
  • Evaluated model performance using Average Absolute Relative Error (AARE) and assessed physical trends.

Main Results:

  • All eight proposed models outperformed literature baselines.
  • Five models surpassed the performance of the CMIS.
  • Two models achieved an AARE below 3% on test data, demonstrating superior accuracy.
  • Models showed physically expected trends in nanofluid viscosity with changing volume fraction.

Conclusions:

  • Advanced machine learning models offer a highly accurate and efficient alternative for predicting nanofluid viscosity.
  • The developed models provide a cost-effective solution for selecting nanofluids for specific applications.
  • The study validates the physical plausibility of the machine learning predictions.