Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025
Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
Microscopic decompressive laminectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic decompressive laminectomy in patients with
Rong Wang1, Xiuxia Li2,3, Xiaogang Zhang1
1Department of Spine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Introduction:
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common lumbar degenerative disease in the elderly, usually requiring surgery if conservative treatment fails. Microscopic decompressive laminectomy (MDL) and percutaneous endoscopic decompressive laminectomy (PEDL) have been widely used to treat LSS. This study aims to provide a protocol for the evaluation and comparison of the efficacy, safety and applicability between MDL and PEDL.
Methods And Analysis:
We will search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MDL and PEDL for treating LSS from inception to December 2019 in the following databases: PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and China Biology Medicine. The quality of included studies will be assessed using the risk of bias tool recommended by the Cochrane Handbook 5.2.0. Subsequently, a meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.3 software.
Ethics And Dissemination:
Given the nature of this study, no ethical approval will be required. The protocol will be disseminated via a peer-reviewed journal.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42020164765.
